他批评说，对文化创造性和机械创造性的区别，已经被漠视和荒废了。前者应由版权来规范，而后者由专利来规范。
He criticizes as obsolete the distinction between literary creativity, which is regulated by copyright, and mechanical creativity, which is regulated by patents.
从基因生物学含义的角度来看，基因符合“新颖性”、“创造性”、“实用性”的三性要求，属于专利保护范围。
From the Angle of biological conception, gene conforms to the all requirements of "novelty", "inventiveness" and "utility", and falls within the scope of patent protect ion.
虽然怀疑者一直认为中国的专利数据被国家驱动的申请指标所扭曲，但知识产权律师辩称，这些数据也反映了中国与日俱增的创造性。
While sceptics have long argued that China's patent figures are skewed by state-driven filing targets, intellectual property lawyers argue they also reflect the country's growing inventiveness.
它在已知的专利文件中并未明显提及。“创造性”和“现有技术”是技术术语。
It is not obvious in the light of what was known before. "Inventive" and "prior art" are the technical terms.
授予专利权的发明和实用新型，应当具备新颖性、创造性和实用性。
Any invention or utility model for which patent right may be granted must possess novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability.
第一章为专利创造性的一般理论。
The first chapter is "the general theory about inventive step of patent".
第二章为美国专利创造性判断的客观化。
The second chapter is "the objectivation tendency of inventive step assessment in the U."
之后，笔者在本部分比较了专利“新颖性”与“创造性”的判断标准，并对判断二者的逻辑关系进行说明；
Then, the author compares the criteria for judging "novelty" and "inventiveness" of the patent and illustrates the logic relations to judge them.
新颖性、实用性和创造性是专利法规定的发明创造获得专利权的实质条件。
Novelty, practical applicability and inventiveness is the substantive requirement to the patentable invention-creation prescribed by the patent law.
第二节介绍各国专利法上对专利创造性条件客观化的规定，并分析创造性客观化的社会经济基础。
The second section discusses the rules to objectivize inventive step requirement, and analyzes the social economic basis of the objectivization of inventive step.
其次理顺新颖性标准和创造性标准中涉及到的基本概念之间的关系，并在此基础上对专利三性的判断顺序提出了自己的观点。
Then it rationalizes the relations between the basic concepts in novelty and creativity, it puts forward its own ideas on the examination order of three characteristics of patent.
第三节论述专利创造性的过度客观化问题，包括这一问题的产生、后果以及提高创造性的思路。
The third section discusses the problem of over-objectivization of inventive step, including its appearance, its influence, and the proposed ways of increasing the standard of inventive step.
第三章为欧洲、日本的专利创造性判断的客观化。
The third chapter is "the objectivization tendency of inventive step assessment in Europe and Japan".
欧洲专利法中有两点最重要的要求，即要成为具有可专利性的发明，必须要有新颖性，还要 包含创造性步骤（《欧洲专利公约》第 52 条规定）。
The two most important requirements in European patent law are that, to be patentable, an invention must be novel and involve an inventive step (Article 52 EPC).
专利无效制度将不具备专利保护条件的错误授权剔除出专利权垄断的范围，使专利制度只奖励那些真正具有创造性的技术革新。
The improperly issued patent can be eliminated from patent monopoly by using patent invalidation system, thus the patent system only award innovation.
所以，具备新颖性、创造性和实用性是授予发明和实用新型专利权的实质性条件。
So, possessing novelty, inventiveness and practical app1icability is the essential condition that any invention or utility model to be granted the patent right.
最后，在对传统专利权利“三性”要求分析的基础上，对商业方法专利权新颖性、创造性和实用性的判断提出一些具体观点。
Last, based three character of traditional patent, some advice has been proposed about examination of business method patent's Novelty, Creativity, Practicability.
1998年以来，世界各主要国家对于电子商务商业方法的可专利性逐渐达成共识，但在实施何种创造性判断标准方面却各行其是。
Since 1998, the main countries all over the world gradually reached an agreement on the patentability of E-business method. However, they set different criteria for the judgment of non-obviousness.
1998年以来，世界各主要国家对于电子商务商业方法的可专利性逐渐达成共识，但在实施何种创造性判断标准方面却各行其是。
Since 1998, the main countries all over the world gradually reached an agreement on the patentability of E-business method. However, they set different criteria for the judgment of non-obviousness.
应用推荐