结果三组术后张口受限度及疼痛分级差异无统计学意义。
Result There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups on trismus and pain.
方法采用数字疼痛分级法（NRS），对200例晚期癌症患者的癌痛程度进行评估；
Methods Evaluating pain degrees of 200 late staged cancer patients against Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
患者均以头痛为第一主诉，本文以改良现时疼痛强度(PPI)评估分级为观察指标。
The first patient complained of are headache, this paper present pain intensity improved (PPI) Assessment Rating were observed.
疼痛按照可视化模拟评分系统分级。
方法：运用自行设计问卷进行调查，并用数字分级法进行疼痛评估。
Methods: To survey by self design questionnaire and assess the pain by digital grading.
所有患者的疼痛评分、Frankel分级和血液参数等的改变，均显示出明显的临床改善。
Changes in pain score, Frankel's classification, and blood parameters demonstrated a significant clinical improvement in all patients.
分析术前及最后随访时的影像学评价、包括疼痛及每日活动评分的临床结果，以及改良Frankel分级法确定的神经学状况。
Radiologic assessment, clinical findings including pain and daily activity scores, and neurologic status using the modified Frankel grade were analyzed before surgery and at the last follow-up.
疼痛程度分级采用语言评价量表(vrs)法。
按照WHO推荐视觉模拟评分方法评估，采用0～10数字进行镇痛强度分级，完全无痛为0分，难以忍受疼痛为10分；
Visual analogous scale (VAS) suggested by WHO was used to assess. Analgesia intensity expressed with 0-10, 0 point as without pain completely, 10 points as unbearable pain;
按照WHO推荐视觉模拟评分方法评估，采用0～10数字进行镇痛强度分级，完全无痛为0分，难以忍受疼痛为10分；
Visual analogous scale (VAS) suggested by WHO was used to assess. Analgesia intensity expressed with 0-10, 0 point as without pain completely, 10 points as unbearable pain;
应用推荐