注意到如果这是，我们解读他论点的方式，和声就不再一个反例了。
Now noticed if that's the way we interpret his argument, harmony works no longer as a counterexample.
通过否定最荒谬的观点…，作者向读者展示他论点的另外一方面。
Having debunked the most outrageous claims of..., author shows the reader the other side of his argument —...
通过否定最荒谬的观点……。，作者向读者展示他论点的另外一方面。
Having debunked the most outrageous claims of..., author shows the reader the other side of his argument -...
辩护律师向法庭出示了证明他论点的证据，终于把陪审团争取到他的一边。
The defense lawyer presented to the court evidences to support this argument, and he eventually won the jury over to his side.
没人相信他的论点。
他的论点无可反驳。
他的论点是多党制会鼓励部落主义。
His argument was that multi-party systems encourage tribalism.
你的所有论点都预先假定他是个理性聪明的人。
All your arguments presuppose that he's a rational, intelligent man.
我们听着他没完没了地重复他的论点。
他在任何地方都没有给出具体的历史背景来支持他的论点。
He nowhere offers concrete historical background to support his arguments.
根据哈特曼巧妙的论点，这就是这个比喻最后的乐章，他称之为反计。
It's this final movement of the simile, according to this ingenious argument by Geoffrey Hartman, that Hartman calls the counter-plot.
我认为这很符合他想要提出的论点。
I think this is fairly faithful to the kind of argument he means to put forward.
在弗兰纳里1994年出版的《未来的食客》一书中，他阐述了自己的论点，人类是地球上的一种新型动物，而且是一种倾向于破坏生态系统的新型动物。
In Flannery's 1994 book called The Future Eaters, he sets out his thesis that human beings are a new kind of animal on the planet, and are in general, one prone to ruining ecosystems.
他将他的论点衍伸到身体本身：姿势、手势、甚至是咀嚼食物的习惯。
He extends his argument to the body itself: posture, gesture, and even habits of chewing food.
在我与他的一次令人难忘的交流中，我指出，他在这个问题上的论点是循环的。
In my one memorable exchange with him, I pointed out that his argument on the question at issue was circular.
他援用了一些中国话来解释他的论点。
He quoted some old Chinese sayings to illustrate his points.
我通过驳斥他的论点挫败了他。
他通过增加细节来强调他的论点。
他将他的论点衍伸到身体本身：姿势、手势、甚至是咀嚼食物的习惯。
He extends his argument to the body itself: posture, gesture, even habits of chewing food.
他的论点是这样的，考虑到物理和化学的性质，只有一些为数不多的途径可以让事物运转。
His argument is that, given the nature of physics and chemistry, there may be only a limited number of ways in which things can work.
为了支持自己的论点，他给出了自1990年以来发生的技术、体系架构演进的一系列例证。
To support his arguments he provides a series of examples of technology and architecture evolution that have occurred since 1990.
他的论点，是生命在组成所有价值时，所扮演的最终角色。
I think that his argument is ultimately the role that life plays in constituting all values.
他的主要论点是老龄化降低了资产价格。
对于构建成功的社交软件需要提防的陷阱来说，他的论点及后续的讨论都提供了很有趣的见解。
His arguments as well as the discussion that has followed provide interesting insights into pitfalls that need to be avoided for building successful social software.
但是他的论点太过于主观了，他能否说服读者，在没有社会媒体工具时，这些社会变革难道不会发生吗？
But for his argument to be anything close to persuasive, he has to convince readers that in the absence of social media, those uprisings would not have been possible.
他的论点仍存争议。
所以说不定柏拉图认识到，最初的论点，并不是他所需要的那样强有力。
And so it might well be that Plato himself recognized that the initial arguments aren't as strong as they need to be.
奥巴马对拷问备忘录的处理显示了他对平衡一论点两个方面的尝试。
Mr Obama's taste for trying to balance both sides of an argument is evident in his handling of the torture memos.
他能在大家面前论证论点“，我喜欢这条，因为这是我对自己的最低目标。”
"He would work through arguments right in front of —" I like this one, because this is what I at least aim to be inside my head.
他能在大家面前论证论点“，我喜欢这条，因为这是我对自己的最低目标。”
"He would work through arguments right in front of —" I like this one, because this is what I at least aim to be inside my head.
应用推荐