Now that looks like a deductively valid argument doesn't it?

这看起来像演绎有效的论点，不是吗？

youdao

The only valid argument I can see for the iPhone not being the best is the AT&T requirement.

就我所知，iPhone唯一不能称为最好的有效论据，是AT&T的条件。

youdao

So it's a valid argument but has false premises. Okay what about if it is an invalid argument with false premises.

这是个有效的论点但是有假前提，如果是无效论点有假前提呢？

youdao

So it's a valid argument but has false premises. Okay what about if it is an invalid argument with false premises.

这是个有效的论点但是有假前提，如果是无效论点有假前提呢？

youdao