So, how does ext3 compare to ReiserFS?
那么，与ReiserFS相比，ext3到底如何呢？
The benefits of journaling and ReiserFS (Part 1).
日志记录和ReiserFS的好处(第1部分)。
I last discussed 2.4 kernel stability when I was covering ReiserFS.
我在介绍ReiserFS时最后讨论到2.4内核稳定性。
ReiserFS is, however, more sensitive than most others to improper alignment.
不过，ReiserFS对不合理的对齐比其他文件系统更敏感。
In the last few months, things have started looking a lot better for ReiserFS.
在过去的几个月中，对于ReiserFS来说，情况看上去已经开始好转许多了。
Yes, it's true; ReiserFS does not yet have a "dump" and "restore" implementation.
是的，这是真的；reiserfs没有“dump”和“restore”实现。
The reiserfs option will be shown only if you've selected SLES 9 or 10 to install.
reiserfs选项仅在选择安装 SLES9或10 时出现。
File systems tested were ext3fs, ext4fs, ReiserFS (version 3), JFS, XFS, and Btrfs.
受测试的文件系统是ext3fs、ext4fs、ReiserFS(第3版)、JFS、XFS和Btrfs。
In this article, I'll show you how to get ReiserFS running under a 2.4 series kernel.
在本文中，我会向您展示如何让ReiserFS运行在2.4系列的内核下。
So, it appears that ReiserFS and the 2.4 kernel have finally resolved their differences.
因此，ReiserFS和2.4内核好象最终解决了它们的差异问题。
These values ranged from 1.10 (for XFS and JFS) to 6.02 (for ReiserFS), with a mean of 2.10.
这些值介于1.10(对于XFS和JFS)到6.02(对于ReiserFS)之间，平均值为2.10。
In my next article, I'll guide you through the process of setting up ReiserFS under Linux 2.4.
在我的下一篇文章中，我将会指导您在Linux 2.4下完成ReiserFS安装的全过程。
Once created, we can put an ext2 or ReiserFS filesystem on it, mount it, and use it as we like.
创建新卷后，可以将ext2或ReiserFS文件系统放在上面、安装它，然后照我们喜欢的方式使用它。
Once rebooted, you'll be able to create a ReiserFS filesystem on an empty partition as follows.
重新启动后，您就可以在一个空的分区上创建ReiserFS文件系统，如下所示。
The ReiserFS mailing list is an excellent source for current, more in-depth ReiserFS information.
要想了解当前更为深入的ReiserFS信息，ReiserFS邮件列表是一个极好的资源。
In first ReiserFS article, I mentioned that ReiserFS has a special feature called "tail packing".
在关于ReiserFS的第一篇文章中，我曾提到ReiserFS有一项特别的功能，称为“tailpacking”。
ReiserFS is a journaling file system that was developed from the ground up with journaling in mind.
ReiserFS是从一开始就按照记录日志的意图而开发的日志文件系统。
In the second half of this article, we're going to take a look at the design vision behind ReiserFS.
在这篇文章的后半部分，我们将看看ReiserFS后的设计理念。
If you're using qmail with ReiserFS, there are a few important resources that you should know about.
如果您正在ReiserFS中使用qmail，您应该了解一些重要的参考资料。
However, a couple of properties of XFS 'journal make this issue less common than it is with ReiserFS.
然而，XFS日志有两个特性使得这个问题不象使用ReiserFS时那么常见。
Since its introduction, ReiserFS has had an unusually high number of stability and corruption problems.
从引入ReiserFS 开始，它一直有数目非常多的稳定性和崩溃问题。
And the news gets even better — it appears that kernel 2.4.18 has a very solid ReiserFS implementation.
甚至还有更好的消息，内核2.4.18好象有一个非常稳定的ReiserFS实现。
Effects on tarball extraction ranged from 1.04 (for ext4fs) to 25.53 (for ReiserFS), with a mean of 10.9.
对原始码提取的影响范围为1.04(对于ext4fs)到25.53(对于ReiserFS)，平均值为10.9。
Also, ReiserFS doesn't have a good track record of NFS compatibility and has poor sparse file performance.
还有，ReiserFS没有好的NFS兼容性跟踪记录，同时稀疏文件性能也较差。
ReiserFS uses a specially optimized b* balanced tree (one per filesystem) to organize all filesystem data.
ReiserFS使用了特殊的优化b*平衡树（每个文件系统一个）来组织所有的文件系统数据。
Interestingly, ext3 handles journaling very differently than ReiserFS and other journaling filesystems do.
有趣的是，ext3处理日志记录的方式与ReiserFS和其它日志记录文件系统所用的方式迥异。
At that point, ReiserFS will offer equivalent data integrity features to those found in the ext3 filesystem.
在这个问题上，ReiserFS将提供和在ext3文件系统中发现的一样的数据完整性功能。
That is, except for deletes; both ReiserFS and ext3 delete files much more quickly than XFS, at least for now.
但这不包括删除操作；至少目前，ReiserFS和ext3删除文件要比XFS快得多。
While ReiserFS generally blows the socks off ext2, ReiserFS does have a few special-case performance weaknesses.
虽然ReiserFS通常抢尽了ext2 的风头，但它在特定情况下确实有性能上的不足之处。
With ReiserFS, XFS, and JFS, the filesystem driver journals metadata, but makes no provisions for journaling data.
使用ReiserFS、XFS和JFS 时，文件系统驱动程序记录元数据，但不提供 数据日志记录。
应用推荐