Data Sharing and PLM strategies.
数据共享和PLM战略。
Product Development and PLM Implementation gap.
产品开发和PLM实施的差距。
We probably are not going to sell PLM products in 2020.
到了2020年，我们可能不会再卖PLM产品了。
Here is a visionary video Siemens PLM released a year ago.
下面这段视频是西门子PLM一年前发布的，展示了当时的设想。
What does it mean for manufacturing companies and PLM vendors?
这对制造企业和PLM供应商来说意味着什么呢？
Now, let’s move to PDM, PLM and other “sorts” of collaboration.
那么，我们来看看PDM,PLM和其他类型的协作吧。
PLM systems don't really manage the product's entire lifecycle.
PLM系统并不是真正用来管理产品完整生命周期的。
Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation.
服务是PLM实施的重要一环。
People keep in PDM/PLM/ERP information about released products.
人们将成品信息保存在PDM/PLM/EDR系统里。
Two years ago, I wrote – SaaS and Open Source: PLM Future Rides.
两年前我就写过一篇博文——“SaaS和开源：PLM的未来之路”。
The definition of PLM is one of the topics I'm discussing on blog.
PLM的定义是我在本博中要讨论的话题之一。
The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation.
SharePoint的实施总是让我联想到PLM的实施。
To provide data analytical solutions for PLM can be an interesting opportunity.
提供数据分析解决方案可能是PLM的一个机遇。
Look on every successful PLM implementation - you will find these elements there.
放眼看去，所有成功的PLM实施都是基于这些要素。
The PLM implementation scope is varied, and every implementation can be different.
PLM实施的范围可大可小，而且每个实施项目都不一样。
I can see different PLM vendors are taking various strategies related to the cloud.
我可以看到PLM供应商都结合云技术推出各种解决方案。
According to Autodesk, most of PLM implementations today are about data management.
据Autodesk称，如今大部分PLM实施都跟数据管理相关。
PLM companies focused on their own product lines and dismissed integration opportunity.
PLM公司只关心自己的产品线，错失了集成的良机。
It made me think about future potential of PLM, Cloud and Open source to play together.
这让我想起了PLM的未来，云计算和开源将并驾齐驱。
PLM concepts requires significant expansion of data management scope in the organization.
PLM这个概念非常注重数据管理在组织内的可扩展性。
From my perspective, PLM systems don't begin to address the entire lifecycle of the product.
据我观察，PLM系统从一开始就不是为解决整个产品生命周期而生的。
Earlier last year, mobile applications were announced by Autodesk, Dassault and Siemens PLM.
去年年初，Autodesk,Dassault和西门子PLM也陆续发布了移动应用程序。
The obvious question asked by many PLM developers was how to improve PLM user experience.
很多PLM开发人员最常问到的一个问题是，如何提高PLM的用户体验。
Read of my previous posts about that – PLM Processes, Lists and Implementation Confusion.
我以前的博文“PLM流程、列表和实施的困扰”对此做了详细解释。
At the same time, CAD vendors continuously developed the tied connection of CAD and PLM tools.
同时，CAD供应商不断开发新的工具，试图将CAD和PLM关联起来。
PLM vendors are trying to tap into cloud delivery by introducing focused applications or product.
PLM供应商都在极力开发集中式的应用程序和产品，试图借此踏入云端。
There is something that related to the PLM vendors work with smaller manufacturing companies.
有一个东西，跟PLM供应商有关，很适用于小型制造企业。
It made me think "what if PLM on the cloud succeeds?", what will be the cost of this solution?
这令我想起了“如果PLM成功应用到云端，将会怎样？”这种方案的成本多大？
Existing PLM software is too expensive and relies on the technologies developed 15-20 years ago.
市面上的PLM软件不仅过于昂贵，而且任然依赖15-20年前的技术。
The PLM implementations are complicated, requires lots of service work and corporate involvement.
PLM的实施相当复杂，需要大量服务性工作和企业的参与。
应用推荐