Concerns about open science should be discussed at the outset of a study.
对开放科学的担忧应该在研究的开始就加以讨论。
Many young researchers, especially those who have not been mentored in open science, are uncertain about whether to share or to stay private.
许多年轻的研究人员，尤其是那些没有接受过开放科学指导的人，并不确定到底是该分享还是保密。
They must determine the risk of jeopardizing a job offer or a collaboration proposal from those who are wary of—or unfamiliar with—open science.
他们必须确定那些对开放科学持谨慎态度或对其不熟悉的人危及工作机会或合作提议的风险。
But many young researchers, especially those who have not been mentored in open science, are uncertain about whether to share or to stay private.
但许多年轻的研究人员，尤其是那些没有接受过开放科学指导的人，对于该分享还是保持隐私是不确定的。
A recent paper, titled "The Natural Selection of Bad Science", published on the Royal Society's open science website, attempts to answer this intriguing and important question.
最近发表在英国皇家学会开放科学网站上的一篇题为《烂科学的自然选择》的论文，试图回答这个有趣而重要的问题。
Kate Ratliff, who studies social attitudes at the University of Florida, Gainesville, says that it can seem as if there are two camps in a field—those who care about open science and those who don't.
佛罗里达大学盖恩斯维尔分校研究社会态度的凯特·拉特利夫说，一个领域似乎会有两个阵营，一个是关心开放科学的阵营，另一个则对其漠不关心。
For another, some people think the open science is unrealistic, for it conflicts with the traditional views and the current institutions, and think it is impossible to be the mainstream.
另一方面它与传统观念和现行制度的冲突，使得许多人认为它颇有理想主义情怀，难以成为主流的科学文化。
Open science also offers junior researchers the chance to level the playing field by gaining better access to crucial data.
开放科学还为初级研究人员提供了机会，通过更好地获得关键数据来公平竞争。
An open-science stance can also add complexity to a collaboration.
开放科学的立场也会增加协作的复杂性。
An open-science stance can also add complexity to a collaboration.
开放科学的立场也会增加协作的复杂性。
应用推荐