For team members who are not developers, introduce them to the Web UI for checking work items and project status.
对不是开发员的队员来说，可以为了检测工作项目和项目状态，而向公司引进网络用户界面。
Those are definitely part of the Ajax experience, but most users — not developers — simply find Ajax applications more usable.
这些绝对是Ajax体验的一部分，但是大多数用户 —而非开发人员 —只是发现 Ajax应用程序更好用。
Many discussions of whether or not developers should use or learn ASP.NET MVC has been going on in blogs, Twitter and forums the last couple of weeks.
最近几周，在博客、Twitter和论坛上如火如荼地展开了一场讨论。 讨论的内容是：开发人员是否应该使用或学习 ASP.NETMVC。
This is made possible by the fact that Amazon, not developers, sets the pricing of each application. Here's how I described the pricing model in my previous post.
这之所以可以实现是因为亚马逊应用商店里的程序是由亚马逊而非开发者定价的。
For team members who are not developers (or those who don't want to install the Eclipse client), introduce them to the Web UI for checking work items and project status.
对于那些不是开发员的团队成员来说(或者那些不想安装Eclipse客户端的团队成员)，可以向他们介绍WebUI以检查工作项以及项目状态。
Not all employees in a software company are developers; in fact, most of them are not.
不是所有软件公司的雇员都是开发者，事实上，大多数人都不是。
The thing to remember, though, is that the spec is for the implementers of the tools, not for application developers per se.
但是请记住这样一件事情，规范是针对工具实现者的，而不是针对应用程序开发人员本身。
If you simply test for specified features, you can determine if they are all implemented, but you cannot determine from this whether or not your developers have implemented unspecified features.
如果您仅仅测试特定的特性，您可以确定他们是否全部都被实现了，但是您不能确定您的开发人员是否实现了那些并没特定指明的特性。
Of course, the notion of what is good code - let alone great code - is one that not all developers will agree upon.
当然，什么样的代码才是好的代码——更不用说伟大的代码了——这一点所有的开发人员都无法达成一致意见。
Developers will not willingly reuse assets unless they are of high quality and applicable to the task at hand.
开发人员不愿意复用资产，除非它们是高质量的并且可应用于手头的任务。
In short, the most important factor in whether or not a program is secure — whether it's FLOSS or proprietary — is whether or not its developers know how to write secure programs.
简而言之，程序是否安全最重要的因素是-不管它是FLOSS还是具有专利权的-其开发人员是否知道如何编写安全的程序。
Some project developers may not want to migrate their projects, even with the 2to3 converter.
一些项目开发人员可能不太想迁移其项目，即便是使用版本2到3的转化器。
Natural languages are very powerful but also very complex; developers not trained in composition sometimes have difficulty communicating complex ideas in writing.
自然语言非常强大，但也非常复杂；未受过写作训练的开发人员在写作中表达复杂想法的时候有时会碰上困难。
The opinions varies from not recommended to all ASP.NET developers should learn it.
从“不推荐学习”到“所有ASP.NET开发人员都应该学习”，各种不同的观点层出不穷。
Developers are not abandoning iPhone for Android.
开发者也不是为了Android而舍弃苹果。
Not many web developers can claim that their error page logo has a fan club, and not many would want to either.
不是多数web开发者都可以声称他们的错误页面有一个fansclub的，也没有多少人希望这样。
It also does not provide Python, Perl, or Ruby — definitely not targeted at developers.
它也没有提供Python、Perl或者Ruby——它的目标用户显然不是开发人员。
One of its major benefits is that it makes Web development easier by putting the hard work on the framework developers, not the application developers.
它的主要好处之一是，它将困难的工作交给框架开发人员而不是应用程序开发人员，从而简化了Web开发。
And that's the often-expressed doubt or concern about whether or not Rails developers should take the time to master Ruby.
这个说法也代表人们常会表达的疑虑：到底Rails开发人员该不该花时间掌握Ruby呢？
The developers should not fear about the learning curve as it would enhance their knowledge.
开发者不应该惧怕学习曲线，因为它将增强他们的知识。
The real estate developers should not seek only profits and build houses for wealthy people only.
开发商们不应该只为了追求利益而只给富人们盖房子。
Because of this inheritance, developers do not lose any functionality by using a strongly typed DataSet.
由于这种继承性，开发人员使用强类型数据集不会丢失任何功能。
But having providers is not enough; developers still need to write a considerable amount of code to setup replication.
但是仅有提供程序还不够；开发者仍需要编写大量的代码来安装副本。
We encourage developers to not group operations based solely on the physical system that they are targeting.
我们鼓励开发人员不要仅仅基于其目标物理系统对操作进行分组。
Within a month the team made great progress even though most of our developers were not UI experts.
尽管大多数的开发者并不是UI专家，但在短短的一个月之内我们取得了重大的进展。
If the developers were not responsible then they could send back code which had no guarantee of being fixed.
如果开发人员不必负责任，他们可能会提交代码而不用保证缺陷都得到修复。
Contrary to some views, agile developers are not mavericks, writing code with no rules or restrictions.
与某些观点相反，敏捷开发人员并非不按规则或限制编写代码的特立独行者。
These tests must be implemented by developers, not by the analysts that may have developed the use cases.
这些测试必须由开发人员实现，而不是由开发用例的分析人员实现。
The simple fact that developers do not need to worry about scalability is by itself huge.
简单的一个例子是开发者不必担心大量数据的可测性。
At first glance, administrators or developers may not appreciate its applicability.
初看上去，管理员或开发人员可能体会不到它的价值。
应用推荐