Numerous early attempts used a thin-kernel approach to segregate the real-time tasks from the standard kernel.
很多早期的尝试使用瘦内核方法把实时任务与标准内核分离。
Xenomai/SOLO announced migration away from the co-kernel approach to a tighter integration with the Linux kernel layer.
Xenomai/SOLO宣布不使用内核共存法，而转向使用与Linux 内核层更加紧密集成的方法。
Although the thin kernel approach has its advantages (hard real-time support coexisting with a standard Linux kernel), the approach does have drawbacks.
虽然瘦内核方法有自己的优势(硬实时支持与标准Linux内核共存)，但这种方法也有缺点。
Where the thin kernel approach relies on a minimized kernel that includes task management, the nano-kernel approach goes a step further by minimizing the kernel even more.
这里瘦内核方法依赖于包含任务管理的最小内核，而超微内核法对内核进行更进一步的缩减。
The thin-kernel (or micro-kernel) approach USES a second kernel as an abstraction interface between the hardware and the Linux kernel (see Figure 3).
瘦内核(或微内核)方法使用了第二个内核作为硬件与Linux内核间的抽象接口(见图3)。
The thin-kernel (or micro-kernel) approach USES a second kernel as an abstraction interface between the hardware and the Linux kernel (see Figure 3).
瘦内核(或微内核)方法使用了第二个内核作为硬件与Linux内核间的抽象接口(见图3)。
应用推荐