In that case, a sharply divided court ruled that the website contained "true threats" that were not protected by the first amendment.
在该案中，庭上意见分歧很大，但最终判定该网站确实包含“真正的威胁”，并不受到第一修正案的保护。
On the other hand, what most of us rely upon I think is essentially the first amendment tradition.
另一方面，我们大多数人遵循的，说到底还是美国第一修正案的传统。
Thornburgh said such demands wouldn't violate the First Amendment.
桑伯说这样的要求不违反第一修正案。
Mr. Helm plans to assert that the bill violates the First Amendment.
赫尔姆先生计划坚定地陈述该法案有违《第一修正案》。
The majority opinion said such limits violated First Amendment rights.
多数人认为这些限制违反了《第一修正案》规定的权利内容。
The court altered its interpretation of the First Amendment.
最高法院改变了对第一修正案的解释。
The decision was the latest in a series of muscular First Amendment rulings from the Roberts court.
罗伯茨在任上作出了一系列维护第一修正案的强力裁决，这个只是最新的例子。
But is - is that - are - are we to sit day by day to decide what else will be made an exception from the First Amendment?
然而我们是否要日日坐在这里，决定还有什么将会成为第一修正案的例外？
Floyd Abrams(2007). Argumentation Story of the First Amendment(translated by Wang Jing, etc). Shanghai: Shanghai SDX Joint Publishing Company.
弗洛伊德•艾布拉姆斯（2007）。第一修正案辩护记（王婧等译）。上海：上海三联书店。
The First Amendment, the core of the Rights Bill, regard the expression freedom as the basic right of a citizen and fundamental right of a freedom society.
第一修正案是权利法案的核心，它将表达自由确立为公民所享有的一项最基本权利和自由社会的支柱性权利。
"An unconditional right to say what one pleases about public affairs is what I consider to be the minimum guarantee of the First Amendment" (Hugo L. Black).
“对公共事件发表意见的自由权力正是我认为应是第一修正案的最低保证”(雨果·l。布莱克)。
"The Supreme Court has been really strong on First Amendment rights," said Margot Kaminski, executive director of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School.
“最高法院对第一修正案权利的态度真的很坚决。”耶鲁大学法学院信息社会项目执行主任玛格·卡明斯基说道。
Apply it too widely and the protection will inevitably be diluted; too narrowly and many eligible people will not be covered, explains Floyd Abrams, a first-amendment lawyer.
FloydAbrams，一位第一修正案律师说，（保护法案）适用范围太广泛，其效力会不可避免地降低；太狭窄则又会使得许多合格的人得不到保护。
Apply it too widely and the protection will inevitably be diluted; too narrowly and many eligible people will not be covered, explains Floyd Abrams, a first-amendment lawyer.
FloydAbrams，一位第一修正案律师说，（保护法案）适用范围太广泛，其效力会不可避免地降低；太狭窄则又会使得许多合格的人得不到保护。
应用推荐