Does it meet performance and failover time requirements?
它满足性能和故障转移时间要求吗？
We can also have the concurrent access on for the raw disks, and that even further reduces failover time.
我们还可以对原始磁盘进行 并发访问，甚至可以进一步减少故障转移时间。
We succeeded in achieving the goal of this POC because the measured failover time was approximately 60 seconds in most cases.
我们成功达到了此POC的目标，因为大多数情况下所测的故障转移时间约为60秒。
For faster failover time the best configuration is to use DMS tablespaces and raw devices, and even better allow concurrent access to the disks.
为了获得更快的故障转移时间，最佳配置是使用dms表空间和原始设备，甚至最好允许对磁盘的并发访问。
We wanted to test for performance, reliability, stability and the requirement to achieve the fastest failover time with a target failover time below 60 seconds.
我们需要测试性能、可靠性、稳定性，并需要取得最快的故障转移时间，其目标故障转移时间要少于60秒。
Raw device usage also improves failover time in case the database is large, because during failover the operating system does not have to do a file check to the file system (FSCK).
如果数据库很大，那原始设备的使用也能减少故障转移时间，因为进行故障转移时，操作系统不必对文件系统进行文件检查(fsck)。
Raw device usage also improves failover time in case the database is large, because during failover the operating system does not have to do a file check to the file system (FSCK).
如果数据库很大，那原始设备的使用也能减少故障转移时间，因为进行故障转移时，操作系统不必对文件系统进行文件检查(fsck)。
应用推荐