The verb 'grow' is ergative because you can say 'She grew flowers in her garden' or 'Flowers grew in her garden'.
grow为作格动词，因为既可以说Shegrewflowersinhergarden，也可以说Flowersgrew in her garden.
The Ergative Hypothesis distinguishes one of the classes of intransitive verbs—unergative verbs (UV).
格律性假设区分了一类不及物动词的——非作格动词（UV）。
And finally the emphasis is put on the conceptual frames of those ergative expressions in English.
然后重点探讨英语语言中作格结构概念框架。
The pragmatic function of the ergative sentence in English is to introduce the discourse participant.
英语作格句的语用功能是引导话语参加者。
Ergative sentences, as a special sentence pattern, are very difficult to master in second language acquisition.
作格句在英语中是一种特殊句式，在第二语言习得中较难掌握。
The present paper is an analysis of the pragmatic function of the ergative sentence in English from the perspective of lexical pragmatics.
本文从词汇语用学视角探讨英语作格句的语用功能实现的机理。
According to syntactic and semantic properties, it is divided into prototypical ergative construction and non-prototypical ergative construction.
以句法、语义特征为标准，将其分为两大类：原型作格句和特殊作格句。
Then through categorization, we find that external causation and spontaneous occurrence codetermine the semantic properties of English ergative pairs.
通过分类与辨析，本文发现外部致使和自发产生是共同决定作格动词的语义特性。
The Ergative Hypothesis proposed by Perlmutter (1978) distinguishes two classes of intransitive verbs --- unergative verbs (UV) and ergative verbs (EV).
提出非宾格假说，将不及物动词分为非作格动词（UV）和作格动词。
The meanings of English monomorphemic ergative verbs are often self-contained, while those of Chinese resultative-compounding ones are contained in the second morpheme.
英语单词素作格动词的语义是内孕式，而汉语动结式作格动词的语义则具有外孕式特征。
The paper analyzes the difference between middle verbs and ergative verbs in argument structures at first:in the former the event argument is suppressed, but the latter does not affect that argument.
本文首先讨论中动词和作格动词论元结构的不同之处：在中动结构中，事件论元受到了抑制； 在作格结构中，事件论元没受到任何影响。
The paper analyzes the difference between middle verbs and ergative verbs in argument structures at first:in the former the event argument is suppressed, but the latter does not affect that argument.
本文首先讨论中动词和作格动词论元结构的不同之处：在中动结构中，事件论元受到了抑制； 在作格结构中，事件论元没受到任何影响。
应用推荐