Objective: To compare the results of serum anti-thyroid antibodies determined by ECLIA and RIA.
目的：eclia与ria测定人血清甲状腺自身抗体的结果分析。
Conclusions The precision and recovery rate of ECLIA are better than that of ELISA. And ECLIA is faster and more stable than ELISA.
结论电化学发光法的精密度、回收率优于酶联免疫法，且具有快速稳定的特点。
Xiao XH, Peng XX, Gong QB, et al. Comparing ECLIA with RIA in detecting serum AFP. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2002; 18(12): 1345.
肖小慧， 彭献香， 龚启斌，等。 电化学发光与放射免疫检测甲胎蛋白的比较。实用医学杂志， 2002；18（12）： 1345。
Methods the serum of 123 cases of patients were detected with ECLIA and ELISA respectively, and the repeatability tests were carried on, then.
方法将123例患者的血清分别用化学发光法和酶联免疫法检测，并做重复性实验。
Methods Serum tumor markers of lung cancer group, benign disease group and health control group were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA).
方法采用电化学发光法(ECLIA)分别对肺癌组、肺部良性疾病组患者及健康人的血清肿瘤标记物浓度进行检测分析。
The results demonstrate that the accuracy and precision of ECLIA is better than that of ELISA in detecting RP, and this means that ECLIA could be a primary method for detecting RP of rHP-HB vaccines.
通过对ELISA法和ECLIA法检测的准确性、精密性(试验内、试验间)进行一系列验证试验，结果显示ECLIA法的准确性、精密性均好于elisa法，证明eclia法可作为检测在研疫苗rp的首选方法。
The results demonstrate that the accuracy and precision of ECLIA is better than that of ELISA in detecting RP, and this means that ECLIA could be a primary method for detecting RP of rHP-HB vaccines.
通过对ELISA法和ECLIA法检测的准确性、精密性(试验内、试验间)进行一系列验证试验，结果显示ECLIA法的准确性、精密性均好于elisa法，证明eclia法可作为检测在研疫苗rp的首选方法。
应用推荐