Patients group showed significantly lower than health group in looking for help scores while higher than disease control and health control group in retreat scores.
抑郁组的寻求帮助因子得分低于健康对照组；抑郁组的退避因子得分高于非抑郁组和健康对照组评分。
Methods: 63 cases were divided into three groups: URI group (33 cases), disease control (asthmatic bronchitis) group (12 cases) and healthy control group (18 cases).
方法：63例，其中上感组33例，疾病对照(哮喘性支气管炎)组12例，健康对照组18例。
Methods The cases are divided into treatment group and control group according to completely randomized design of non-equilibrium, treatment group with 30 cases, control group with 28 cases.
方法按完全随机非平衡设计分为治疗组和对照组，治疗组30例，对照组28例。
Results the symptom control and absorption in therapy group were better than those in control group.
结果穿刺治疗组在症状控制与脓肿吸收时间方面均优于保守组。
Compared the POAG group with control one, the Vv and Ss ofcapillaries in ONH were significantly reduced (P<0.05), The morphometer NA in POAG group was no different with control (P>0.05).
病例组血管管径减小，血管的体积密度和相对面积比率均较对照组显著降低（P<0.05），而两组的血管数量密度无明显改变（P>0.05）。
The effect of blood glucose control, therapeutic time, insulin dose of observe group were superior to those of control group(P<0.05).
观察组降低血糖效果、控制血糖达标所需时间及胰岛素剂量均优于对照组（P均<0.05）；
Results There were notable differences between the lung cancer group and the control group in the following aspects:anxiety, depression, anger, reason, mood control, optimism and social support.
结果肺癌患者在焦虑、抑郁、愤怒、理智、情绪控制、乐观及社会支持方面均与对照组有显著性差异。
The patients in the control group received routine therapy, while in the observation group, process quality management method was adopted to achieve quality control at various phases.
对照组按常规方法治疗，观察组在治疗过程中采用过程质量管理方法对各环节质量进行控制。
During the extended follow-up period, the risk of death from any cause was actually higher in the tight control group, 22.8%, vs. those in the moderate control group, 21.8%.
在延长的观察期间，任何原因引起的死亡风险在严格控制组(22.8%)比适度控制组(21.8%)高。
Control group given drug therapy and General canker knowledge health education, experimental groups in the control group basis gives full health education.
对照组给予药物治疗和一般溃疡病知识健康教育，实验组在对照组基础上给予全程的健康教育。
Divide rats into normal control group, blank control group, aspirin group, and Bitongxiao group to observe at different times Bitongxiao's effect on chemical radiculoneuritis in duplicated models.
将大鼠分为正常对照组、空白对照组、阿司匹林组、痹痛消颗粒组，在不同时间观察痹痛消对化学性神经根炎模型的影响。
METHOD Adopt case - control and history case - control study, divided delivery women into responsibility midwifery group and traditional midwifery group.
方法采用同期对照和历史对照研究的方法，将产妇分为责任制助产组和传统助产组。
Results: the mortality, sequela, the in-hospital time and time for convulsion control in the treatment group were significantly superior than that in the control group.
结果：治疗组在死亡率，后遗症，住院周期，控制抽搐时间上明显优于对照组。
The body weight and the organ coefficient were all lower than the control group, but only brain coefficient of the high group between the control group were statistically significant (P<0.05).
染毒大鼠体重、各脏器系数均低于对照组，但只有高浓度组大脑脏器系数与对照组比较差异有显著性（P<0.05）；
Methods 45 senile mice were randomly divided into senile blank control group, senile positive control group and senile Runchang pill group.
方法昆明种自然衰老小鼠45只随机分为老年空白对照组、老年阳性对照组、老年润肠丸组；
The scene control of sudden group incidents refers to the directing activities that the commander and the commanding organs conduct to control the situation of the sudden group incident scene.
群体性突发事件的现场控制，是指挥员及其指挥机关为控制群体性突发事件现场形势而进行的指挥活动。
They were randomized into 5 groups named blank control positive control low dosage experiment group moderate dosage experiment group and high dosage experiment group 8 rats in each one.
随机分为5组，空白对照组、阳性对照组、低剂量实验组、中剂量实验组和高剂量实验组，每组8只。
Mice were randomly divided into normal saline control group, ali group, DATS prevention group, DATS treatment group, and DATS control group.
实验动物按随机数字表法分为生理盐水对照组、ALI模型组、DATS预防组、DATS治疗组和DATS对照组。
Results treatment group and control group in the total efficiency was 100%, but the treatment group without complications, compared with the control group.
结果治疗组与对照组的总有效率均为100%，但治疗组无并发症，优于对照组。
Results Phlebitis and plugging the incidence of the observation group was lower than control group, but infusion speed was more rapid than the control group.
结果观察组留置针的静脉炎和堵管发生率远远小于对照组，而输液速度快于对照组。
On the basis of the research on various group control algorithms of elevators, the group control algorithm based on multiple object fuzzy comprehensive judgement is stated.
在研究多种电梯群控智能算法的基础上，提出基于多目标模糊综合评判的电梯群控算法。
SD rats were randomly assigned to five groups as follows: saline control group, D-galactose group, DHEA-treated normal group, vehicle control group and DHEA-treated senescent group.
衰老模型实验：SD大鼠随机分为对照组、D-半乳糖组、正常用药组、溶媒对照组和药物治疗组。
Methods60 children were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group with 30 cases in each group, and having 30 pneumonia children as another control.
方法60例哮喘患儿随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例，另设普通肺炎对照组30例。
Methods: 156 cases were divided into treatment group and control group randomly. The treatment group were given Qingre Huazhi Granular while the control group were given Jianer Qingjie Solutions.
方法：将患儿156例随机分为治疗组和对照组，治疗组口服清热化滞颗粒，对照组口服健儿清解液。
Conventional treatment methods were given to cases in control group. On the base of control group, small compound prescriptions were added to in treatment group, successively 14-21 days.
对照组给予西医常规治疗，治疗组在此基础上给予中医小复方辨证治疗，连续观察14 ~ 21天。
Compared with negative control group, the doubling time of both positive control group and experimental groups was prolonged.
与阴性对照组比较，阳性对照组和实验组细胞群体倍增时间增加。
The cesarean section rate and postpartum hemorrhage was lower than that of control group. The newborn apnea rate of experimental group was lower than that of control group.
结果实验组疼痛程度明显低于对照组，实验组剖宫产率明显低于对照组，实验组产后出血和新生儿窒息率明显低于对照组。
Results: The symptomy and sign's recovery of treatment group was prior to the control group (P< 0.01), and their hospital stay was obviously shortened as compared with the control one (P< 0.01).
结果：治疗组发热、咳嗽、气急、紫绀、肺部罗音恢复情况明显优于对照组，住院日明显缩短，两组六项观察指标差异显著（P<0.01）。
Results the complete control rate for dizziness was 87.9% in the treatment group and 27.0% in the control group with a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
结果：治疗组眩晕的完全控制率为87.9%，对照组眩晕的完全控制率27.0%，两组差别有统计学意义。
Results the complete control rate for dizziness was 87.9% in the treatment group and 27.0% in the control group with a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
结果：治疗组眩晕的完全控制率为87.9%，对照组眩晕的完全控制率27.0%，两组差别有统计学意义。
应用推荐