• The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient.

    头孢呋辛普生酯头孢呋辛酯均有效。

    youdao

  • RESULTS The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient (effective rate is 87.50% and 85.37%) and there was no statistically significant difference between them(P>0.05).

    结果头孢泊肟头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染的总有效率分别为87.50%85.37%,两者差异统计学意义(P>0.05);

    youdao

  • RESULTS The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient (effective rate is 87.50% and 85.37%) and there was no statistically significant difference between them(P>0.05).

    结果头孢泊肟头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染的总有效率分别为87.50%85.37%,两者差异统计学意义(P>0.05);

    youdao

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定