Next time you state your position, formulate an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good.
下次当你陈述你的立场时，要为你的陈述形成一个论点，并诚实地问自己你的论点是否是个好论点。
One day later, people who had a resolved argument reported no increase of negative emotions compared with those who avoided an argument.
一天后，与那些避免争辩的人相比，解决问题的人就不会增加负面情绪。
When people had an argument that they considered resolved, they had half the reactivity of those who avoided an argument.
当人们有一个他们认为已经解决的争辩时，他们的情绪反应是那些回避争辩的人的一半。
Prof: yes you could say that, but that would be a different argument, but still an argument.
教授：是的你可以那样说，但是那样,就是另一个论点了，但依然是一个论点。
I praised you for leaving out the argument indicators but the only argument indicators I want you to leave out is Since and because and so on.
你们去除论点指示词值得表扬，但是我想让你们去除的唯一的论点指示词，因为和因为等等。
Prof: And therefore it became an argument or you started to see that it was an argument. Is that right?
教授：所以这成为了一个论点，或者你开始明白这是一个论点，对吗？
And try to make the argument you actually give, so then when we start evaluating argument we can look at it.
试着创造你们给出的论点，然后当你开始评价论点的时候，我们可以看看。
The concern that open data may simply empower the empowered is not an argument against open data; it's an argument against looking at open data as an end in itself.
关心公开数据也许授权被授权的不是针对公开数据的争论；这是一个针对公开数据以自身为目的的争论。
He particularly encouraged internal argument among his advisers, thrashing out both sides of an argument.
他尤其鼓励他的顾问之间进行内部辩论，并且会反复研究辩论双方的观点。
Actually a valid argument doesn't have true premises and true conclusion what is a valid argument?
实际上一个有效论点没有真前提和真结论，什么是有效论点呢？
So let me finish with a brief outline of Barkleys view of perception which is the main argument that he used against Locke's argument related to this.
让我把柏克莱关于感知的要点简单归纳下，他用这些主要的论点来驳斥洛克的相关理论。
According to the soul-theory argument for soul, rather, according to the argument for souls, you needed to believe in souls in order to explain how you could have a person.
根据灵魂理论的说法，或宁可说是灵魂作用的说法，人需要相信灵魂的存在才能解释作为人的存在。
You may attack the person making the argument rather than the argument that is being made.
你可以攻击那个人，做出论点，而不是之前做过的。
Do you think an argument could be valid if all its premises of the argument is false?
你们认为一个论点，如果前提为假，可能有效吗？
You are able to disagree now because people who saw that argument as faulty set out to make a better argument and proved it.
你现在能够表达反对意见，是因为认为这个论题是错误的人们，提出了更好的论点并证明了它。
That's a strong inductive argument, why isn't that a deductive argument?
这是个有力的归纳论点，为什么不是演绎论点呢？
That's right. So if you have a valid argument a deductively valid argument in which the conclusion is false then you know one of the premises must be false.
对，所以如果论点有效，一个演绎的有效论点中结论是假的，你就知道前提中有一项是假的。
And I said we we're going to set out logic book style all we're going to do is identify the argument, analyze the argument, reveal its structure.
我说我们会把它们设定成逻辑的课本形式，我们所做的就是识别论点，分析论点，揭露结构。
A fallacy is an argument that looks like a good argument, can easily be mistaken for a good argument, but isn't a good argument.
谬论是看起来像好论点的论点，很可能被误解为好论点，但不是好论点。
I call the second argument "the argument from recycling" — not the best label I suppose, but I've never been able to come up with a better one.
我把第二个观点称为“循环观点”，可能这不是最好的名称，但是我没有想到更好的。
Could this argument be valid say yes - as a matter of fact this argument must be valid.
这个论点有效，说对-，实际上这个论点肯定有效。
Don't forget a conclusion is anything that plays a role in an argument and in this argument, this is not playing a role in the conclusion.
别忘了结论可能是，在论点中有角色的，在这个论点中没有扮演角色。
If you find this argument convincing, what it's an argument for is the claim that even if souls do exist, they may not be the key to personal identity.
如果你信服这个观点，我们要证明的是，就算灵魂真的存在，也不是人格同一性的关键。
Anselm's ontological argument or William Rowe's complex version of a probabilistic argument from evil.
的本体论进行论证，或是罗威廉William Rowe复杂版的有关邪恶的概率论证。
Okay, 2 questions to ask is, that isn't an argument or that isn't a good argument.
好，两个问题是，没有论点，或者不是一个好论点。
This input can come either from a file specified as the last command line argument, or from standard input if no file name argument is given.
该输入可以来自作为最后一个命令行参数指定的文件，在没有给出文件名参数时也可以来自标准输入。
Note that the first argument is not an argument at all, as no comma (,) separates the level (KERN_CRIT) from the format string.
注意，第一个参数并不一个真正的参数，因为其中没有用于分隔级别(KERN_CRIT)和格式字符的逗号(，)。
This says, I need a second argument to it, and that second argument better be a point so I can do the comparison.
这里我需要第二个参数，第二个参数最好是一个点，这样我就能做比较了。
The first argument is the substring, the second argument is the search string, and an optional starting position can be supplied as a third argument.
第一个参数是子字符串，第二个参数是搜索字符串，可选的起始位置可以提供作为第三个参数。
The first argument is the function name, the second the argument list, and the third is the code you wish to execute.
第一个参数是函数名，第二个参数是参数列表，第三个参数是希望执行的代码。
应用推荐