在理解上，笔者通过对一起案例，三种证明标准的适用比较，来论述高度盖然性应掌握的尺度。
In understanding, I compared three standards through a case, in order to discuss the degree to the probability.
而实现法律真实这一证明要求的手段，即为高度盖然性的证明标准。
And realize law true means that identification require this, high identification standard of probability.
这一规定第一次明确的将高度盖然性作为我国民事诉讼的证明标准。
This provision will be the first time, clearly a high degree of probability as China's civil standard of proof.
在我国民事诉讼中，引入高度盖然性的证明标准既有其合理的根据，又有其重要的意义。
In our country's civil action, the identification standard of introducing the high probability has already had its rational foundations, there are its important meanings.
它要求法官、陪审团以“良心”和“理智”、“经验”与“理性”作为评判证据、认定事实的准则，并以一系列的程序制度（如辩护制度、审判分开制度等）为保障，在程度上满足“高度盖然性”。
It askes the judges and jury to rely on the conscience reasonableness intellect N reason and expereence to assess the proof and determine the facts.
它要求法官、陪审团以“良心”和“理智”、“经验”与“理性”作为评判证据、认定事实的准则，并以一系列的程序制度（如辩护制度、审判分开制度等）为保障，在程度上满足“高度盖然性”。
It askes the judges and jury to rely on the conscience reasonableness intellect N reason and expereence to assess the proof and determine the facts.
应用推荐