然而，尽管这样，精神病学中自由意志的问题似乎几乎完全被忽略出辩论话题之外。
And yet despite this, the issue of free will in psychiatry seems almost completely neglected outside of forensics.
在这本著作中，他对一些哲学里常年不衰的问题进行阐述并给出了自己的定义，包括罪恶、自由意志和决定论，正义和美德的性质等问题。
In the book he sets out and defines some of the perennial problems of philosophy, including the problem of evil, free will and determinism, the nature of justice and of virtue.
我只是想尽可能地，把这个问题提出来，以帮助你们认识到，为什么我不认同自由意志是灵魂的制胜利器？
I simply want to point out enough about the problem to help you see why I don't think free will is a slam-dunk for the soul.
梅莱说，问题是在于，大多数当今的哲学家认为自由意志并非如此。
The trouble is, most current philosophers don't think about free will like that, says Mele.
对于一个古典哲学家来说，这只是关于自由意志的三个不同版本的问题，其实质是相同的。
To a classic philosopher, these are just three versions of the same question about free will.
这并不是说我们把哲学问题交给了一个盖洛普调查。(“好吧，投票结果是65%对35%，那么我猜答案是……人类确实拥有自由意志！”)
The idea is not that we subject philosophical questions to some kind of Gallup poll. " Well, the vote came out 65 percent to 35 percent, so I guess the answer is... human beings do have free will!"
正如我上次所说的,自由意志这个主题或者说自由意志,决定论,因果论,责任,这一堆问题,是极端困难和复杂的物理问题
Now, as I said last time, the subject of free will--or free will, determinism, causation and responsibility, this cluster of problems-- is an extremely difficult and complicated physical problem.
在这一点上，你就可以展开关于自由人士和自由意志者们谈到的自由有何区别这个问题的广泛讨论。
At that point you start to get into a broader discussion about the differences between what liberals and libertarians mean when they talk about being free.
针对这些问题，汤森勋爵设想的自由意志主义回答分别是：自由贸易、不可以、没有。
Thelibertarian answers, presumably to be elicited by Lord Townshend's questions, are, respectively: free trade, no, and no.
要回答这个问题，我们必须首先指出“自由意志”，它控制著地球及宇宙其他地方里的所有灵魂的行为。
To answer this question, we must first address the "free will" that governs the actions of all souls on Earth and elsewhere in the cosmos.
Baumeister和他同时的第二个研究检验了寻找自由意志信念和助人行为之间联系的个体差异问题。
A second study by Baumeister and colleagues examined individual differences looking for an association between believing in free will and helping behaviours.
持自然权利论和无为而治思想的自由意志主义者们总是无法回避他们理论中的一些问题或空白点，其中之一就是税制。
Natural-rights, laissez-faire libertarians always confront several problems or lacunae in their theory. One is taxation.
当然，有问题的要说服人们走出自己的自由意志。
Of course, there is the problem of persuading people to move out of their own free will.
基于这个问题就回到关于“自由意志”和“吸引力法则”的方面，要知道，造物主不能去干预你们自己带给自己的事情。
It comes back to freewill and the Law of Attraction, and God cannot interfere with what you have brought upon yourselves.
现在我们将处理一些其他不同类型的问题，关于自由意志和随后关于其他问题的询问。
Now we shall address a different sort of question about free will and then queries about other issues.
对于自由意志这个问题的传统说法，是指行为者在作最后决定之前的那种踌躇考虑。
The traditional treatment of the problem of free will refers to the actor's vacillation before the final resolution.
只有造物主能够修改祂的法则，对于自由意志的这个问题，祂做出了两次改变。
Only Creator can amend Its laws, and in the case of free will, It has done so twice.
某天，上班的途中，一个老掉牙的问题忽然从我脑海里冒出来：我们是否拥有自由意志，还是说，我们只是木偶戏里那些被人控制的木偶。
That age-old question hit me one day on my way to work: Do we have free will or are we just puppets in a 1)Punch and Judy show?
从理论上说，这一时期的争论主要集中在人的自由意志与神的预定的关系问题上。
Theoretically, this controversy focused on the relation between the free will of human beings and the predestination of God.
意料之外的，这些自由的激进因素产生了关于自由意志、创造力、甚至被我们称为灵魂的物质的本质的问题。
Unanticipated, these free radicals engender questions of free will, creativity, and even the nature of what we might call the soul.
意料之外的，这些自由的激进因素产生了关于自由意志、创造力、甚至被我们称为灵魂的物质的本质的问题。
Unanticipated, these free radicals engender questions of free will, creativity, and even the nature of what we might call the soul.
应用推荐