他连续地讲些模棱两可的话，而不是作出明确的肯定或否定的回答。
He kept making ambiguous remarks instead of straightforward yes-or-no replies.
这种行为有没有合理性呢？会不会很快改变呢？对第一个问题，回答是肯定的，而第二个问题的答案却是否定的。
Does this behaviour make sense? Is it likely to change soon? The answer to these questions is: Yes and, in all probability, No.
对第一个问题，回答是肯定的，而第二个问题的答案却是否定的。
Theanswer to these questions is: Yes and, in all probability, No.
本文将论证，笛卡尔和莱布尼茨对上述第一个问题都给出了否定的回答，而霍布斯则给出了肯定的回答。
I will argue that both Descartes and Leibniz offered a negative reply to the first question, while Hobbes offered a positive one.
正反问反问句是一类较特殊的反问句，形式上虽然与正反问询问句相似，却不需要听话人回答而能表示出肯定或否定的倾向。
A or-A rhetorical questions have two kinds: one is to negate its front item, the other is to negate its back item.
他经常拿这个问题自问自答，虽然他的回答常常是肯定的，但有时也会是否定的。
And this question, which he was continually repeating to himself, though oftenest answered with a "Yes," had sometimes its "No."
他经常拿这个问题自问自答，虽然他的回答常常是肯定的，但有时也会是否定的。
And this question, which he was continually repeating to himself, though oftenest answered with a "Yes," had sometimes its "No."
应用推荐