最近我尝试回答关于如何比较XML文档,从而发现它们是否相同的一个简单问题。
Recently I went about trying to answer a simple question about how to compare XML documents to find out whether they're the same.
甚至更加完善,它会定期地自动保存文档,这样一来,即使在退出的时候忘了保存文档,仍然可以恢复到最近一次自动保存的副本,对我来说这是个非常好的特性。
Even better, it periodically saves a document by itself, so even if I mistakenly exit without saving, I can still recover from the last auto-saved copy — which to me was a fantastic feature.
例如,我最近在所谓的“管道”中实现了它,该“管道”通过xslt样式表和定制过滤器的组合来转换输入文档。
For example, I recently implemented it in a so-called "pipe" that transforms input documents through a combination of XSLT style sheets and custom-made filters.
于是,我只使用rdf:about ,而不再使用 rdf:ID ,在艰辛地经历了与对包含文档的假设URI解析ID有关的所有缺陷之后,最近,我采用了这一约定。
Then, I only use rdf:about, never rdf:ID, a convention I recently adopted after hard experience with all the pitfalls associated with resolving IDs against the supposed URI of the containing document.
我最近还写了Google的Bigtable相关内容,它不是一种关系型或面向文档的数据解决方案(且它偶尔不支持JDBC)。
I have also recently written about Google's Bigtable, which isn't a relational or document-oriented data solution (and, incidentally, doesn't support JDBC in any way).
我最近还写了Google的Bigtable相关内容,它不是一种关系型或面向文档的数据解决方案(且它偶尔不支持JDBC)。
I have also recently written about Google's Bigtable, which isn't a relational or document-oriented data solution (and, incidentally, doesn't support JDBC in any way).
应用推荐