如果我开始运行多久(时间)我应该运行日常(非停止)减掉20 - 30磅？
If I start running: How long (time) should I run everyday (non-stop) to lose 20-30 pounds?
我不关心云运行在什么操作系统之上，但是我的实例应该在1到2分钟、甚至更短时间内启动起来。
I don't care what OS the cloud is running on, but my instance should be live for me within 1-2 minutes or LESS.
应该运行所有选择方法，让我看到哪个选择方法最快，哪个最慢。
It would run all of the selection methods, so that I can see which selection methods are fast, and which ones are slow.
注意最后一段，如果我要这样做，也就是运行所有可能的答案，我还是想知道要是没有结果呢？，在这个例子中应该返回什么呢？
Notice one last piece. If I'm going to do that, run through all possible answers, I still want to know, gee, what if there aren't any answers? How do I return that case?
最后，应该显示所有结果，并附带所用的运行时间，让我能够在所有库之间进行比较。
Finally, it would present all of the results with appropriate times, allowing me to easily compare the results of all the libraries against each other.
我将暂停一会儿，在我运行之前，我想问问你们你们，心算得出的答案应该是什么。
And I'm going to pause for a minute, before I run it, and ask each of you to compute in your head what you think the answer should be.
上个月我介绍过如果想让Trip的记录在服务器重新启动之后保留，应该在production模式下运行。
Last month, I told you to run in production mode if you wanted your Trip records to stick around between server restarts.
再一次，我不会解释你将如何运行这两个脚本。应该有大量的在线资源，为您排忧解难。
Again, I won't explain how you will run these two scripts. There should be plenty of resources online to help you out.
更好的方法是，寻找一种方法来表明某个模板属于我所感兴趣的组，并指定在我运行tracexsl . xsl时应该跟踪哪些组。
A better approach would be to find a way to say that a template belongs to a group I'm interested in, and specify which groups should be traced at the time I run tracexsl.xsl.
我应该把它放到一个测试组件中，我运行100次，200次，1000次，但是我现在不想用这个来烦你们。
I should really just put it in a nice test harness, where I run 100, 200, 1,000 trials, but I didn't want to bore you with that here.
我应该会有完全相同的比赛，每次运行与贪婪算法？
Should I expect to have exactly same match everytime I run the match with greedy algorithm?
我觉得是不是应该翻译成， “波音公司为了填补菲尔•康迪特离去的空缺，让本来打算退休的哈里斯通塞弗德继任，哈里斯通塞弗德是业内行家，曾任公司总裁及首席运行官。” --楼上说得对。
So Boeing sought to plug the gap by hauling Harry Stonecipher, an industry veteran who had previously acted as the company's president and chief operating officer, out of retirement。
我认为这不太男人了，John，你知道的，他们仅仅是认为比起用手做来,更应该直接去运行程序，但是这确实是调试代码的非常有价值的工具，让我在这里给大家演示下吧。
I guess it's not macho enough, John, to just, you know, you know, go off and do things by hand, you ought to just run them, but it's a valuable tool to get into, so let me do that here.
现在我正在尝试在虚拟机上安装10.04的第一个测试版本，如果我按照下面这些（或者说可能是这些）的说明来安装的话，应该可以（希望可以）使Unity运行。
now going to try installing 10.04 beta 1 into VirtualBox which should (fingers crossed) allow Unity to work if I follow these (or maybe these) instructions.
因为我想要测试的是逻辑的东西包含在方法或对象的代码，我不觉得我应该有一个服务器运行。
Since the code I want to test deals with logical stuff contained in methods or objects, I don't feel I should have to have a server running.
我应该去哪一个（或多个组合的）这种任务（长时间运行的过程与几个邮件）？
So, among Whenever, Delayed_job, Sidekiq, Resque Scheduler & co. with which one (or combination of ones) should I go for this kind of task (long-running process with several mailing)?
我应该去哪一个（或多个组合的）这种任务（长时间运行的过程与几个邮件）？
So, among Whenever, Delayed_job, Sidekiq, Resque Scheduler & co. with which one (or combination of ones) should I go for this kind of task (long-running process with several mailing)?
应用推荐