英国剑桥大学教授费利西娅和同事一道分析研究了2776名受试者的资料，他们都参与了1946年英国的出生调查。
Felicia Huppert of the University of Cambridge and colleagues analyzed data from 2,776 individuals who participated in the 1946 British birth study.
英国剑桥大学教授费利西娅和同事一道分析研究了2776名受试者的资料，他们都参与了1946年英国的出生调查。
Felicia Huppert of the University of Cambridge and colleagues analyzed data from 2, 776 individuals who participated in the 1946 British birth study.
现在，剑桥大学也精通此道了。
有人认为这一套思想糊涂呆钝，剑桥大学的知名批评家李维斯认为，福斯特的“克拉克讲座”凸显了“知识分子的微不足道”。
Some regarded this as woolly thinking—a famous Cambridge critic, F.R. Leavis, believed his Clark Lectures were characterised by “intellectual nullity”.
英国剑桥大学教授费利西娅和共事一道分析研究了2776名受试者的资料，他们都参与了1946年英国的出生调查。
Felicia Huppert of the University of Cambridge and colleagues analyzed data from 2776 individuals who participated in the 1946 British birth study.
有人认为这一套思想糊涂呆钝，剑桥大学的知名批评家李维斯认为，福斯特的“克拉克讲座”凸显了“知识分子的微不足道”。
Some regarded this as woolly thinking—a famous Cambridge critic, F. R. Leavis, believed his Clark Lectures were characterised by "intellectual nullity".
老布拉格在1912年夏得知这个消息，与他儿子小布拉格一道尝试用X射线的粒子性解释它，并由小布拉格在剑桥大学重复这个实验。
After receiving this news in the summer of 1912 in Leeds, W. H. Bragg tried to explain it by the particle theory of X-rays, while his son w.
老布拉格在1912年夏得知这个消息，与他儿子小布拉格一道尝试用X射线的粒子性解释它，并由小布拉格在剑桥大学重复这个实验。
After receiving this news in the summer of 1912 in Leeds, W. H. Bragg tried to explain it by the particle theory of X-rays, while his son w.
应用推荐