现在，更新后的文件与清单4相似。
所创建的示例代码与清单1类似。
具体的值应该与清单5中所示类似。
The values should be similar to the ones shown in Listing 5.
输出应该与清单11 中所示类似。
这个文件与清单1相似。
与清单1一样，最终所有的输出内容都是空白。
As it stands in Listing 1, the result is that all output content is blank.
会看到与清单9相似的代码，但是不完全一样。
You will see something similar to Listing 9, although it will not be exactly the same.
清单7与清单2中的JSF页面类似。
将清单13的输出示例与清单6比较。
Compare the sample output in Listing 13 to that in Listing 6.
将JSP文件与清单1.2对比，以改正任何错误。
Compare your JSP file with Listing 1.2 to correct any errors.
因此我们的文件表内容提供程序类与清单8 类似。
So our file table content provider class looks like Listing 8.
上述代码采用了与清单2内的代码编辑器相同的方式。
This code USES more or less the same methodology as the code editor in Listing 2.
当您执行清单1，输出看起来与清单2相似。
When you execute Listing 1, the output looks like Listing 2.
清单3中的代码与清单2中的代码有些相似。
The code in Listing 3 has some similarities to what you saw in Listing 2.
对于有两个函数的模块，副文件与清单7相似。
For a module with two functions, it may look like Listing 7.
将要更改的代码所在的区域与清单4 所示区域相同。
The area of code you are going to alter is the same area displayed in Listing 4.
在这种情况下，安装模块的命令与清单2相似。
In this case the command to install a module is similar to that shown in Listing 2.
这5个条目中的每个条目看上去都应该与清单15中的类似。
Each of the five entries should look like the in Listing 15.
验证您的代码是否与清单2中的代码类似。您可以忽略注释。
Verify that your code looks similar to what is shown in Listing 2. You can ignore the comments.
清单6使用粗体显示了两处增强(与清单5相比)。
You can see two enhancements in Listing 6 (as compared to Listing 5) shown in bold.
完成的ajaxFunction应该与清单6 相似。
完成之后，HTML文件的头部元素应该与清单2类似。
When you're done, the head elements of your HTML files should look like Listing 2.
清单2对其进行了说明，它产生与清单1等同的输出。
Listing 2, which produces output equivalent to that of Listing 1, illustrates.
使用与清单1相同的代码，代理可以生成xml格式的视图内容。
Along the same lines as listing 1, an agent can generate the contents of the view formatted as XML.
另外，为了连接ids，部署计划需要包含与清单2相似的信息。
Also, the deployment plan needs to contain information similar to what is shown in Listing 2 to establish connectivity to IDS.
页眉和页脚的结果HTML代码与清单6中的代码类似。
The resulting HTML code for your headers and footers looks like the code in Listing 6.
清单7与清单6相反——即在父进程之前终止的子进程。
Listing 7 shows the opposite of Listing 6 — that is, the child dying before the parent.
验证您的代码是否与清单1中的代码类似。您可以忽略注释。
Verify that your code looks similar to what is shown in Listing 1. You can ignore the comments.
从本质上说，清单3产生的输出与清单2的输出是相同的。
The output from Listing 3 is essentially the same as Listing 2.
这就是清单2为什么与清单1中的原始代码有所不同的原因。
This is the reason why Listing 2 was slightly different from the original code in Listing 1.
应用推荐