• 结果有效率为85%以上。

    Results Total effective rate is above 85%.

    youdao

  • 结果:使用爽肤后患者总有效率为100%。

    Result: The total effect of toilet powder was 100%.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率为90.2%,对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。

    Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).

    youdao

  • 结果一个疗程治愈率达80%,有效率93%。

    Result Onecourse of treatment cure rate up to 80%, always efficient 93%.

    youdao

  • 结果:维拉帕米治疗室上心动过速有效率94%。

    Results: The total clinical effective rate of verapamil was 94%.

    youdao

  • 结果氯地平降压有效率为93%。

    Results: The total antihypertensive effective rate of amlodipine was 93%.

    youdao

  • 结果有效率96%,发现因损伤大血管造成大出血病例

    Results: the total effective rate was 96% and there were no major case in those patients.

    youdao

  • 结果显示有效率95,95 %,治疗期间任何毒副作用

    The result showed total effectiveness 95.95%, treatment period has not seen any poisonous side effect.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗因多囊卵巢综合征出现无排卵性功血证属肾虚血瘀型的有效率为87.5%,排卵为66.67%,妊娠率为54.55%。

    Results the total effective rate was 87.5%, the ovulation rate was 66.67%, and the pregnancy rate was 54.55%.

    youdao

  • 结果:治疗对照组有效率分别为72.2%和 67.6%,组间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。

    Results: The total effective rates were 72.2% and 67.6% in dexzopiclone and control group (P>0.05).

    youdao

  • 结果氯地平降压有效率为94%。

    Results The total antihypertensive effective rate of amlodipine was 94%.

    youdao

  • 结果经医学统计学处理有效率之间显著差异,(P< 0 .0 1)。

    Results and conclusion: The total effective rate had significantly difference between two groups ( P<0.01) .

    youdao

  • 结果有效率达96%。

    Results: The effective rate was 96%.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗总有效率95%,对照组有效率为82%(P<0.01)。

    Results: The effective rates of treatment group and control group were 95% and 82%(P< 0.01), respectively.

    youdao

  • 结果:柳胺酚治疗有效率为89%。

    RESULTS: The total effective rate of osalmide was 89 %.

    youdao

  • 结果两组有效率比较,差异显著性

    Results There was a significant difference in the total effective rate.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率明显高于对照组差异显著性。

    Results There was significant difference in the efficient rate between treatment group and control group.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗对照组临床疗效有效率分别为86.7%67%;

    Result:Treatment group and control group clinical total effective rate were 86.7% and 67%;

    youdao

  • 结果有效率为89.4%,对照组为68.3%。两组疗效有显著差异(P<0.01)。

    Results The clinical effective rate of Sang Cba was 89.4%while the control group was 68.3%(P<0.01).

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率95.9%,对照组总有效率78.6%,治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。

    ResultsThe total efficacy rate was 95.9% in the treatment group and 78.6% in the control group.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率为94.2%,对照组为78.1%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

    Results The total effective rate was 94.2% in treatment group and 78.1% in control group(P<0.05).

    youdao

  • 结果治疗患者有效率96.67%,对照组患者的总有效率为83.33%。

    Finally: Treatment group patient's total effectiveness is 96.67%, control group patient's total effectiveness is 83.33%.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率为82%,死亡率仅为14%;

    Results:The total effective rate was 82% while the mortality was 14% .

    youdao

  • 结果治疗心律失常有效率90%。

    Results the total rate of the curative effect is 90%.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率90 % ,对照组总有效率60 % (P< 0 .0 5 )。 提示虫草二至丸对单纯性肾小球性血尿有效。

    Results:The total effective rate was 90% in treatment group and 60% in control group, P<0.05.

    youdao

  • 结果对照组有效率为65%,治疗100%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。

    Results: the total effect rate of the control group and therapeutic group is 65% and 100% respectively.

    youdao

  • 结果治疗有效率89.3%,对照组总有效率64.3%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);

    Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).

    youdao

  • 结果疗程结束,治疗组有效率总有效率方面与对照组显著差异。

    Results after complete the treatment course, there is obvious difference in effectiver

    youdao

  • 结果有效率96 % ,治愈率4 5 2 % ,无效率3 9% ,有明显的镇痛作用消瘀散结作用。

    Results The total effective rate was 96%, inefficiency 3 9%, and cure rate 45 2%.

    youdao

  • 结果观察治疗痛风局部症状有效率为95 % ,对照组总有效率为77.5 % (P<0 .0 5 )。

    Results The total effective rate(TER) in test group was 95%, while 77.5% in control( P< 0.05).

    youdao

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定