经统计学分析，两种方法得到的结果没有显著性差异。
Two methods were not significant difference by statistics analysis.
结果：两组下胫腓分离治疗经统计有显著性差异（P<0.01）。
Result:There was a significant difference(P<0.01)in statistics between two groups .
结果各组之间血清学无显著性差异。
Result No significant difference was found in seropositivity rate among every group.
实验进一步验证了压强对实验结果的非显著性影响。
Nonsignificant influence of pressure on the experimental result was further confirmed by the experiment.
两级医院诊断结果差异有显著性（P＜0.01）。
There were obvious difference between the two class hospitals (P<0.01) .
结果两组妇女和丈夫的上学年限间差别具有显著性意义。
Results The difference of the time in school of women and husbands were significant.
结果乙醇浓度对提取有极显著性影响。
RESULTS The alcohol concentration was remarkable factor in the test.
结果两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性。
Results There was a significant difference in the total effective rate.
最后结果采用统计方法进行描述性分析和差异显著性检验。
Descriptive analysis and difference significance test of statistics method were adopted in finally result analysis.
结果治疗组总有效率明显高于对照组，差异有显著性。
Results There was significant difference in the efficient rate between treatment group and control group.
两组结果有显著性差异。
结果表明：含水率在微地域上有显著性差异；
The results show that there is obvious difference between different ravines;
结果：两组患者术后无疼痛和轻微疼痛的例数有显著性差异。
Result: These two group have great statistic different between postoperative without ache and slight ache.
结果：治疗组和对照组疗效差异有显著性意义。
Results: the treatment group and the control group have the significant difference.
结果干预前、后测得社区居民的心理健康水平差异有显著性意义（P<0.01）。
ResultsThe mental health of community residents is different before and after intervention (P<0.01).
结果：治疗组总有效率为90.2%，与对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).
与国家标准分析方法进行对照，结果无显著性差异。
The result by this method agreed well with the result of GB standard method.
结果两培养基的培养结果差异有显著性。
Results Two culture medium raise results have the remarkable difference.
结果：两组患者术中循环变化无显著性差异。
结果：对照组总有效率为65%，治疗组为100%，两组比较有显著性差异（P<0.05）。
Results: the total effect rate of the control group and therapeutic group is 65% and 100% respectively.
男性儿童感染率为35.05％，女性儿童感染率为33.20％，男女儿童蛲虫感染率无显著性差异，与以往结果相同。
The infection rate of male and female children was 35.05 % and 33.20% respectively, without markable difference (P > 0.05) .
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果显示：基底细胞层厚度在治疗前后统计学显示差异有显著性（P＜0．001）。
It was found tha basal cell zone was greatly improved after treatment (P< 0.001).
结果临床疗效治疗组总有效率89。8%，对照组总有效率66。1%，两组有显著性差异P。
Results the total effective rate of the treatment group was 89.8% and 66.1% of the control group.
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
应用推荐