The treatment group was treated by SI.
治疗组采用疏血通注射液治疗；
Lovastatin was added to the treatment group.
均应用强的松，治疗组加用洛伐他汀。
The treatment group could also regulate lipid.
治疗组有调节血脂的作用；
The treatment group did not appear adverse reactions.
治疗组用药过程中均未出现不良反应。
Side effects of the treatment group were rare and mild.
治疗组副作用少而轻微。
Divides into the treatment group and the control group.
分为治疗组与对照组。
There was no severe side effects in the treatment group.
治疗组未见严重不良反应。
The treatment group 64 cases, given the Reduning treatment.
治疗组64例，给予热毒宁治疗。
The treatment group was better than the control group (P<0.05).
治疗组优于对照组（P<0.05）。
He noted that very few side effects occurred in the treatment group.
他特别提到治疗组几乎没有副作用出现。
The treatment group were based on the use Deanxit therapy treatment.
治疗组在对照组基础上加用黛力新治疗。
Therefore, the treatment group was more effective than control group.
说明治疗组的临床疗效优于对照组。
Results: the treatment group was more effective than the control group.
结果：治疗组疗效优于对照组。
And the degree of hepatocyte steatosis did not change in the treatment group.
治疗组肝细胞脂肪变性程度无显著变化。
The serum fibrinogen level was decreased significantly in the treatment group.
治疗组血纤维蛋白原水平降低显著，不良反应轻微。
Results: the efficacy of the treatment group was better than the control group.
结果：治疗组的疗效优于对照组。
Results: the treatment group and the control group have the significant difference.
结果：治疗组和对照组疗效差异有显著性意义。
Results: the effect of the treatment group was superior to that of the control group.
结果治疗组临床疗效优于对照组。
Results: the treatment effectiveness can be enhanced obviously in the treatment group.
结果：治疗组能明显提高治疗有效率。
Secondary asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 case of the treatment group.
治疗组继发无症状性颅内出血1例。
The treatment group treats in the control group in the foundation, gives the background music.
治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上，予以背景。
RESULTS The effects of the treatment group were significantly better than the control, P<0.01.
结果推拿二步八法的治疗组疗效明显优于对照组，P<0.01。
Result The effective rate in the treatment group was 95.20 % and 78.13 % in the control group.
结果治疗组有效率95.20%，对照组78.13%，穴位贴敷疗法疗效优于针灸治疗（P<0.05）。
ResultsThe total efficacy rate was 95.9% in the treatment group and 78.6% in the control group.
结果治疗组总有效率95.9%，对照组总有效率78.6%，治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。
Results the total effective rate of the treatment group was 89.8% and 66.1% of the control group.
结果临床疗效治疗组总有效率89。8%，对照组总有效率66。1%，两组有显著性差异P。
The treatment group received Bing Hong San treatment, while control group received routine treatment.
治疗组用冰红散治疗，对照组用常规方法治疗。
Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为90.2%，与对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为90.2%，与对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
应用推荐