p That is p total of the system.
这是系统总动量。
So p total is now less than, for the real case, is less than p total for the ideal case.
所以总的p，对于真实的情况，现在比理想情况下的总的p要低。
So for a total of C times p minus one total constraints.
所以一共C个约束条件。
I want p, total pressure, as a function of yB.
我想知道p，总压强，作为yB的函数。
The total effective ratio of two groups had significant difference(P<0.05).
两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
There was no significant change in serum total alkaline phosphatase(P >0.05).
血总碱性磷酸酶水平无明显变化（P>0.05）。
The total feed intake and feed coefficient were very significantly (P<0.
对欧鳗黑仔苗的总摄食量、饵料系数有显著的影响（P＜0。
Results: The total effective rates were 72.2% and 67.6% in dexzopiclone and control group (P>0.05).
结果：治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为72.2%和 67.6%，组间比较无显著差异（P＞0.05）。
Results The total effective rate was 94.2% in treatment group and 78.1% in control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组总有效率为94.2%，对照组为78.1%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
Results and conclusion: The total effective rate had significantly difference between two groups ( P<0.01) .
结果：两组经医学统计学处理总有效率之间有显著差异，（P< 0 .0 1）。
The total positive rates of different age groups were no significant difference(P >0.05).
不同年龄组总阳性率的比较差异无显著性（P>0.05）。
The total effective rate in treatment group was than the control group(P<0.01).
治疗组总有效率优于对照组（P<0.01）。
Results:The total effective rate was 90% in treatment group and 60% in control group, P<0.05.
结果：治疗组总有效率90 % ，对照组总有效率60 % （P< 0 .0 5 ）。 提示虫草二至丸对单纯性肾小球性血尿有效。
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
Thesequence of leaching loss from forest floor was K>organic C>total N>total P.
枯枝落叶层的养分淋失量以全K最大，其次为有机质、全N、全P。
Results The total effective rate(TER) in test group was 95%, while 77.5% in control( P< 0.05).
结果观察组治疗痛风局部症状总有效率为95 % ，对照组总有效率为77.5 % （P<0 .0 5 ）。
Result:The total effective rate was 80% in treatment group and 67% in control group, P< 0.05.
结果治疗组有效率为80%，对照组有效率为67%（P<0.05）。 结论疏肝活血利水法治疗难治性青光眼有显著疗效。
There was a significantly difference in the total effective rate between both groups(P<0.01).
试验组咽黏膜水肿和颜色淡白亦明显高于对照组，两者均有显著性差异（P<0.01）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
应用推荐