The physical capacity of intervention group was better than that of control group.
肥胖实验组经干预体能明显优于对照组。
The common carotid artery walls in intervention group and control group were normal.
干预组与对照组颈总动脉血管壁未见异常。
At each time point, HSCs in intervention group were more than the pathological group.
在同一时间点，抗氧化剂干预组hsc数量少于病理造模组。
They were randomly assigned to a dietary intervention group (40%), or a control group (60%).
她们被随机分为饮食干预组（40%）及对照组（60%）。
The life quality of intervention group was improved, while that of control group was declined.
干预组的生命质量有所提高，而对照组却下降。
Randomly, rats were grouped into control group (c), simple stress group (m), intervention group (t).
动物按体重随机分组，分为对照组(C)，单纯应激组(M)，干预组(T)。
Conclusion Comprehensive group intervention can ease test anxiety, improve their self-confidence and mental health state.
结论综合性团体干预能减轻大学生考试焦虑，增强自信心，改善心理健康状况。
The normal control group was not given any intervention.
正常对照组不进行任何干预。
Conclusion: The group intervention is effective in improvement of diabetics' quality of life.
结论：小组治疗对于糖尿病患者的生活质量干预有明显效果。
Intervention time and intervention study were the same as sleeping experiment of every group.
每组干预时间及干预措施同睡眠时间实验。
On the one hand can make up for lack of group intervention;
一方面可以弥补团体干预的不足；
No intervention was given in the blank control group.
空白对照组未进行干预。
No intervention was given in the control group.
对照组不进行干预。
The mental intervention was given to the experiment group.
对实验组进行系统的产前健康教育。
Test group were given nursing intervention, control group were given routine care.
试验组给予护理干预，对照组仅给予常规护理。
Test group were given nursing intervention, control group were given routine care.
试验组给予护理干预，对照组仅给予常规护理。
应用推荐