This method is used by compilers.
编译器会使用这个方法。
Other compilers may name things differently.
其他编译器可能有不同的命名方式。
Modern compilers, however, do a lot more.
现代的编译器，但是，做得更多。
Some compilers provide for some automatic use of this.
有些编译器提供了一些自动使用。
In fact, this is just a tradition followed by compilers.
事实上，这只是编译器的习惯做法。
Several compilers require such types to be fully qualified.
有些编译器要求对这种类型进行完全限定。
Development environment (compilers, make utilities, and so on).
开发环境(编译器，make工具，等等)。
Compilers are free to evaluate in whatever order they like.
编译器可以以任意顺序自由评价。
We can see evidence of the compilers groping towards a "system".
我们可以知道编者是如何摸索编目方法的。
But keep in mind, too, that different compilers adopt different models.
但是，也不要忘记，不同的编译器采用的是不同的对象模型。
It is not possible to compile code by hand, so they always use compilers.
手工编译代码绝无可能，所以他们一定要用到编译器。
There are a large number of compilers available, including many free ones.
现在有大量的编译器存在，其中有许多是免费的。
"Compilers Principles" is a main professional course in computer speciality.
《编译原理》是计算机专业的一门主要的专业课。
Not all compilers are flexible enough or provide these types of services, however.
但并不是所有编译器都足够灵活到可以提供这些服务。
Since then it has been used as the target for several other experimental compilers.
此后它已经被用做多个其他实验编译器的目标。
And relative to the compilers for performance, it can reduce the code size from 15% to 20%.
相对于优化性能的目标代码，可缩小代码大小的15%到20%。
These instructions were translated back into machine language by interpreters and compilers.
这些指令由解释器或编译器翻译成机器语言。
P. s. different compilers might produce different results. But I guess you already know that.
附注：不同的编译器可能会产生不同的结果。但我想你已经知道了。
Many other compilers use the same calculation, often with a minor reordering of the structure.
许多其他的编译器使用相同的计算，通常的结构稍作调整。
Parallelizing compilers provide an important way for people to acquire high quality parallel software.
并行编译器为人们获得高质量的并行软件提供了一条很重要的途径。
Would you deny them this definition of "compilers" because of that last, insignificant-in-comparison step?
你会否定他们的这一定义的“编译器”因为这最后的一步，相比微不足道？
Would you deny them this definition of "compilers" because of that last, insignificant-in-comparison step?
你会否定他们的这一定义的“编译器”因为这最后的一步，相比微不足道？
应用推荐