上周,我们讨论了医学期刊的一个问题:作者问题。
Last week, we discussed one problem for medical journals: the question of authorship.
再读一遍文章,并通过回答以下问题来了解作者的写作目的。
Read again for the writer's purpose of the text by answering the following questions.
教育工作者不知道如何处理这个问题。
如果您是一位作者,请考虑我们的恳求:不要忽视这些问题!
If you are an author, consider this our plea: don't ignore these issues!
在本文中,作者没有提到的一个问题是颜色选择。
One issue the author has not touched on in this article is color selection.
这不是一个在那种层面上尊崇作者权威的问题。
It's not a question of deferring to authority in that sense.
我相信XML规范的作者在这个问题上说得很明确了。
本文作者没有和他们两人探讨有关劳斯莱斯的问题。
The author of this piece did not discuss Rolls-Royce with either of them.
我同意这个作者所说的任何东西。无论怎样,我没办法经常这样思考问题。
I agree with everything these authors say. However, I did not always think this way.
而文章的作者显然没有想过提出这个问题。
And the author of the article apparently never thought to bring up the issue.
这当然是协议作者要解决的一个问题。
This is certainly a valid concern to be addressed by the protocol author.
如果您有关于ConTest 的更多问题,请联系作者。
Please contact the authors if you have further questions about ConTest.
在《什么是作者》中,福柯谈到了这些问题?
所以,基本上,这位作者认为生命的问题是什么?
So, basically, what is the problem of life according to this author?
作者同时也承认,这并非一个新问题。
而且,聪明的新闻工作者知道,没有愚蠢的问题。
Smart journalists know, moreover, that there are no stupid questions.
他的确关心作者关心的问题,而且观众也感觉到了。
He really did share the writers' concerns, and the audience sensed that.
本文的作者介绍了每种组合的WSDL和SOAP消息,以帮助您解决这个问题。
The author describes the WSDL and SOAP messages for each combination to help you decide.
工作者角色有两个基本的问题。
问题:正在测试的对象创建了合作者对象。
Problem: The object being tested creates a collaborator object.
作者对所讨论的问题的态度似乎是。
这位作者还关心一体化的问题。
作者提出“有劳无获”的问题是因为。
The author raises the question "what about pain without gain?" because.
然后就问关于作者的问题。
我们并不会在一切问题上赞同我们的国际合作者。
We don't agree with our international partners on everything.
我们并不会在一切问题上赞同我们的国际合作者。
We don't agree with our international partners on everything.
应用推荐