两组有效率比较差异有非常显著性（P＜0.01）。
The stastical difference was very obviously before treatment and after treatment. (P<0.01).
两组患者治疗有效率的比较：阿加曲班组有效率91.67%。 奥扎格雷钠组有效率87.50%。
The effective rate of the two groups: The argatroban group is 91.67% and theozagrel group is 87.50%.
两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
The total effective ratio of two groups had significant difference(P<0.05).
结果两组总有效率比较，差异有显著性。
Results There was a significant difference in the total effective rate.
结果桑茶的总有效率为89.4％，对照组为68.3％。两组疗效有显著差异（P<0.01）。
Results The clinical effective rate of Sang Cba was 89.4%while the control group was 68.3%(P<0.01).
结果：两组经医学统计学处理总有效率之间有显著差异，（P< 0 .0 1）。
Results and conclusion: The total effective rate had significantly difference between two groups ( P<0.01) .
结果两组痊愈率无明显差别，试验组的有效率明显高于对照组。
ResultsThere is no significant different in recovery between two groups. Experimental group has higher effective.
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
结果临床疗效治疗组总有效率89。8%，对照组总有效率66。1%，两组有显著性差异P。
Results the total effective rate of the treatment group was 89.8% and 66.1% of the control group.
结果：对照组总有效率为65%，治疗组为100%，两组比较有显著性差异（P<0.05）。
Results: the total effect rate of the control group and therapeutic group is 65% and 100% respectively.
两组总有效率比较有显著性差异（P<0 。0 5 ）。
There are significant difference between two groups ( P <0.05).
两组总有效率比较有显著性差异（P<0 。0 5 ）。
There are significant difference between two groups ( P <0.05).
应用推荐