Objective to investigate clinical effects of glass fiber post and metal post in anterior teeth restoration.
方法比较玻璃纤维桩和金属桩各91例的前牙修复效果。
Conclusion Glass fiber post is better in restorative effects and histocompatibility compared with metal post.
结论玻璃纤维桩的修复效果和生物相容性优于金属桩。
In cast metal post and core group 4 teeth were found root fracture, 3 cast metal post and core were loose and 8 teeth were with gingival grey line.
而铸造金属桩核组发生根折4颗、铸造金属桩核脱落3颗，出现牙龈色素沉着8颗。
Fiber post is superior to conventional metal post when strength, hardness, aesthetic performance, erosion-resistance, fatigue-resistance, and biocompatibility are considered.
与传统的金属桩相比，纤维桩的强度、硬度、美学性能、抗腐蚀、抗疲劳性能以及生物相容性均比较优越。
FIBER post: Prepare the root canal with the Pre-Shaping and Finishing drills, according to manufacturer's instructions. METAL post: Sandblast the surface of the post.
纤维桩：依照厂商说明使用预成钻和完成钻进行根管预备。金属桩：对桩的表面喷砂。
FIBER post: Prepare the root canal with the Pre-Shaping and Finishing drills, according to manufacturer's instructions. METAL post: Sandblast the surface of the post.
纤维桩：依照厂商说明使用预成钻和完成钻进行根管预备。金属桩：对桩的表面喷砂。
应用推荐