• Robert Nozick, one of the libertarian philosophers we read for this course, puts it this way: Individuals have rights.

    罗伯特·诺齐克,本课涉及到的一位自由主义哲学家,是这样说的:,个人有权利。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Suppose Archie Bunker were Jacques Derrida, and Jacques Derrida came along and said, "What is the differance?"

    假设阿,邦是雅,德里达,雅,德里达走过来说,区别在哪“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • All right, the idea that taxation is theft, Nozick takes that point one step further.

    很好,关于税收是盗窃这个观点,诺齐克要更进一步。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Nozick says, if you think about it, taxation amounts to the taking of earnings.

    仔细想想,诺齐克说征税相当于强占收入。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Arkay Debunker But there are cases--suppose Archie Bunker were Arkay Debunker.

    但是也有另外的情况,假设阿,邦是。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • The first he calls justice in acquisition or in initial holdings.

    第一个原则,诺齐克称之最初占有的公正原则。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • John Locke accounted for the rise of private property from the state of nature by a chain of reasoning very similar to the one that Nozick and the libertarians use.

    从自然状态角度,解释了私有财产的兴起,他的推理思路,和诺齐克等自由主义者的思路相似。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Nozick doesn't himself fully develop the idea of self possession.

    齐克并没有独立创建,自我拥有理论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • That's Alex and Julia and John and Robert Nozick.

    这是亚历斯,朱莉娅,约翰和诺齐克所认为的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定