God prefers the offering of Abel, and as a result Cain is distressed and jealous to the point of murder.
上帝经常给亚伯恩典,结果,引发了该隐的嫉妒之心,起了杀意。
Note also that Cain is culpable, and for someone to be culpable of something we have to assume some principle that they have violated.
该隐是有罪的,对那些将要犯罪的人,我们制定了了一些规则。
And so in this perspective we have an image of the awesome power of the Deity Himself thundering away behind every jot and tittle of Milton's great epic.
从这个角度,我们能看到,上帝的神力隐去了,藏到了弥尔顿的史诗的一点一滴中。
But the great thinkers were very far from being just so to speak detached intellectuals.
但是伟大思想家根本不是,所谓的隐世知识分子。
And one reason why we know that is in studies like the IAT, the Implicit Attitudes Test.
之所以这样说,是因为,像内隐态度测试这样的实验。
We call those the Apocrypha, "the hidden writings," is what it means. Yes,sir?
我们把那些书称为伪经,它是“隐文“的意思,请讲?
Implicit declaration of function increment.
函数增长的隐式说明。
Edgar Lee Masters They are Dreiser, Edgar Lee Masters Lewis H.L. Mencken, Anderson, and Lewis: all American writers. Compare that with the catalog that he gives of his reading on 249, and you'll see what's being elided.
有德莱塞,门肯,Anderson和:,对比一下,他在249页讲的那类作家,你们会发现他隐去了一些内容。
Abel is a keeper of sheep. He represents the nomadic pastoralist, unlike Cain who is the tiller of soil, so he represents more settled urban life.
亚伯是一个牧羊人,代表着不断迁徙的牧场主,而该隐是一个农夫,他代表在城市定居的人。
And ironically you sense, when you read this that even though Cain intends this as a rhetorical question "Am I my brother's keeper?"--in fact, he's right on the money.
当读到这一段的时候,你能感觉到其中的讽刺意味,尽管该隐的回答是一个设问句,“难道我是他的看守吗?“,事实上,指钱的话,他说的是对的。
Now the murder of Abel by Cain is followed by some genealogical lists.
现在该隐杀亚伯有了后续版本。
We can connect it with the fact that God has created humans in his own image, but the God-endowed sanctity of human life is an assumption, and it's the violation of that assumption which makes Cain culpable.
这点可以与上帝按照自己的意愿,造出人类联系起来,但是人类的神圣性,只是一个臆断,如果臆断是真的话,该隐的罪行就违背了这种说法。
Also, more generally, it could be that these implicit attitudes play a role in judgment calls.
更普遍地来说,这些内隐态度可能,会影响你的主观判断。
Before we leave this story and move onto Cain and Abel I just want to make a couple of quick observations.
在我们开始该隐和亚伯之前,我想做个简短的评论。
I will now welcome you to participate in an experiment on implicit attitudes.
现在请大家来参与,一个关于内隐态度的实验。
They're automatic rules of the same sort we're going to talk about in the context of visual perception in that they're implicit and unconscious and not accessible to explicit understanding.
这些自动的规则,和我们将要讨论的视觉感知是类似的,因为它们都是内隐的,无意识的,也是无法清晰了解的
What was Romulus' murder of Remus or Cain's murder of Abel, ? but the kind of murder that founded, at the basis of the founding of cities and civilizations?
罗慕洛斯谋杀双胞胎兄弟雷摩斯,或该隐弒杀亲弟埃布尔,不都是为了创建而为的谋杀吗,为了创建城市及人类文明?
All of this in a way is another way of saying or at least implying okay that political philosophy is an imminently practical discipline a practical field.
也就是说,无论从哪个层面来看,或隐指,政治哲学都是一门,迫切相关于实用的学科,一块实用的研究领域。
The Cain and Abel story which is in Genesis 4:1 through 16 this is the story of the first murder, and it's a murder that happens despite God's warning to Cain that it's possible to master the urge to violence by an act of will.
创世纪》第四章,1到16节,讲述的是该隐和亚伯的故事6,这是人类历史上第一宗谋杀案,尽管上帝警告该隐,邪念会让人暴力相向。
This was developed by Mahzarin Banaji who used to be at Yale and now is in an inferior university in Boston and it's called implicit attitudes test and it's the biggest psychology experiment ever done in terms of people.
这是Mahzarin,Banaji研究出来的,他以前在耶鲁任教,现在在波士顿一间大学任教,这个叫内隐态度测试,这是有史以来最大规模的一个心理实验,从人数上来讲的话。
应用推荐