So when you say,though,theological appropriateness is what ended up being the most important criterion for including stuff in the canon,you actually have to say then, "Appropriate to whom?"

但是如果你说神学合适性,是选择正典书目,最重要的标准，那么你可以问，“对谁合适？“

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Or at least,it is clear what your alternatives are; it's not clear which alternative would be any better.

至少就算选择明确;,哪个选择比较好的标准却不明确。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And what were the criteria they used?

还有，他们的选择标准是什么？

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Well, unlike the choosiness studies, here we actually have some pretty good cross-cultural data So one study, for instance, was done in 10,000 people from thirty-seven countries, ?" asking people, "Who do you want to be with?"

与伴侣选择标准研究不同，我们事实上有一些很好的跨文化数据,例如，有一个调研,以来自37个国家的1万个人为调研对象，问他们“你最想和谁在一起“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

But there's nothing in the body view to give us a reason to make that choice.

但肉体理论没有一个标准让我们做出选择。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Flexibly,here are the criteria.

不确定地说，选择标准是这样的。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选