-
The passage is also famous because in it Milton does something that he almost never does. Milton has made a mistake.
这篇文章有名也是因为弥尔顿做了一些,他几乎从未做过的事，弥尔顿犯了一个错误。
-
I'm not at all sure there's anything more to be said about that passage, which I think lays it to rest.
我不确定这篇文章是不是,还要更多的讲解，就这样的吧。
-
You also read an article by Milgrom where Milgrom talks about Priestly cultic imagery serving as a kind of theodicy.
在米尔格罗姆的一篇文章中,这篇文章讲到祭司的宗教仪式,被形象化为一种神义论。
-
Now I want to contrast that with what we see from Nabokov in this essay, Good Readers and Good Writers.
现在我要把这和《好读者和好作者》这篇文章中,纳博科夫的观点做下比较。
-
You remember they're wandering around the forest without her picking berries. The younger brother, - the second brother, is most concerned about his sister's safety -- so I want you to look at this passage.
你们记得他们在树林中游荡,没有拿他们采摘的果子，小哥哥，也就是二哥哥，是最关心他妹妹安全的-,所以我想让你们看这篇文章。
-
They read. And one of the people that was reading this literature was a high school teacher who was teaching mathematics in Basil, Switzerland.
其中一个读过这篇文章的人,是个教高中生的老师,在瑞士的罗勒教数学。
-
I guess it struck the author of that article that Redleaf is just a guy who was very curious about a lot of things.
我认为打动这篇文章作者的是,莱德利夫是一个,对很多事都抱有好奇心的人
-
But he ends that famous section with this passage.
但他用这么一段话结束了这篇文章
-
This then leads to a very different discussion because A play is not a piece of text. A play is a living thing That is meant to be performed by actors in a particular setting. Different actors with different directors interpret the words of Shakespeare to the best. We can construct those words differently.
这引起一场很不同的讨论,因为一部戏剧不是一篇文章，而是活物,是要被演员在特定的场景下,表演出来的，不同的演员,和导演尽可能去诠释莎士比亚的文字,我们可以以不同方式建构这些文字。
-
Right, we see in this passage something that reveals so much about what the Greek values were and you'll see how closely they were tied up with the polis and the primacy of the polis in their lives.
对的,我们在这篇文章中,看到了很多揭示希腊人价值观的东西,你们能看到他们和城邦以及城邦在他们,生命中至高无上的地位之间有多么紧密相连
-
Now this may suggest a certain condescension both toward theory and toward literary text, which is not at all intended.
选择这篇文章也许意味着,要对理论和文本进行一定的浓缩，这一点不是我想要的。
-
Now the part of the essay just prior to this explains that he gave this little quiz that you see to some college students when he was giving a lecture.
在先前已经解释了这篇文章的一部分,他把你们所看到这个小测试在他的讲座上,给一些大学生做了。
-
I want to quote from the beginning of Roland Barthes' essay, which I know I only suggested, but I'm simply going to quote the passage so you don't have to have read it, The Death of the Author.
我想引用罗兰，巴特文章开头的几句话，我只是推荐这篇文章，从中引用几句,所以你们不用事先读，这篇文章就是《作者之死》
-
Now this passage is famous for a lot of reasons, not least of which is that it's wonderful.
这篇文章在今日如此出名有很多原因，不仅是因为它本身很精彩。
-
We have the line spectra lying out there in the literature, and people read the literature.
这篇文章也涉及到了线光谱,人们都读过这篇文章。
-
Whatever danger a particular text may pose to the state is outweighed by the greater harm of the official elimination of that text or by the greater harm of the punishment of the author.
这个文章对政府产生的威胁远远比不上,官方对这篇文章的打压的危害,和作者的批判的危害。
-
But be aware of that distinction and that article.
现在得知道这个区别和这篇文章。
-
I think I might want to take it down before he comes.
但在他来之前我得把这篇文章撤掉
-
You're probably a little frustrated because maybe you sort of anticipated what he was going to say, and then you read it and you said, "Gee, he really isn't saying that.
如果你差不多猜出了他要说什么的话,你可能会有点沮丧，如果你读这篇文章，就会说：“哎呀，他不是这个意思。
-
It's in that context, needless to say, that I'd like to take a look at these two interesting passages on the sheet that has Anton Chekhov on one side and Henry James on the other.
不用说这节课,我将会谈到纸上列出的这两篇有趣的文章,一篇是契诃夫的而另一篇是亨利，詹姆斯的。
-
You can read this and you can learn because it's well-written.
通过读这篇文章，你能学到一些东西,因为这写得很好。
-
We'll say a little bit about Beyond the Pleasure Principle, ; which is the crucial text for our purposes; but plainly apart from the influence of and the ideas borrowed from Freud, you'll find Brooks writing on what for you is pretty familiar turf.
我想花一点点时间说说《超越快乐原则》,这篇文章对于我们今天理解主题至关重要;,但是如果不看从弗洛伊德那里借来的思想和影响外，布鲁克斯所写的对于你们来说应该会很熟悉。
-
This is beautiful writing.
这是一篇漂亮的文章。
-
It's a very hard-hitting critical article.
这是篇很尖刻的批评性文章
-
The essay that you read in its entirety for today, "Structure, Sign and Play in the Language of the Human Sciences," was delivered on the occasion of a conference about "the sciences of man" at Johns Hopkins University in 1966.
今天我们要读的是一整篇文章，名为《人文科学话语中的结构、符号和游戏》,这篇文章发表于1966年,在约翰普金斯大学召开的一个会议上，会议主题是“人类科学“
-
The two passages that I'm about to read juxtapose the viewpoints that I've been trying to evoke in describing Gadamer's position.
我要读的这两篇文章在某些观点上是并行的,我在讲伽达默尔的看法时想激发的就是这些观点。
-
It does so by insisting on a complex mode of ambiguity that governs the passage--not atmosphere.
这篇文章很朦胧，很复杂,算不上是一种气氛。
-
It deploys and manipulates those gross constituent units of thought in the ways that we saw, but notice what Levi-Strauss is saying in that essay as opposed to the passage Derrida has just quoted.
它通过我们看到的方式来,调动和使用那些大构成单位，但请注意列维在这篇文章里所说的,与德里达引用的，形成了鲜明的对比。
-
I'll just point you quickly to this passage.
我来快速给你们指出这篇文章。
-
In this article, they talked about the correlation of consumption around the world.
在这篇文章中，他们讨论了世界范围内的消费相关性。
应用推荐