And the first thing you do is ask is it an instance of some problem that other people have already solved?
而且你以前从没碰过这个问题,你首先要做的一件事就是问问自己,这是不是一个别人已经解决了的问题?
So I think this question is very much related to your first one about how we mistake what success really means.
我觉得这个问题与,你的第一个问题紧密相连,就是“我们对于成功的错误理解“
And I want to get at that question of embarrassment, because it comes up very explicitly on page 36.
我还想讲一下刚才那个关于难堪的问题,因为在第36页明确提出了这个问题。
It only stands to reason, I think, that Milton would want to inscribe within this poem the problem posed by this extraordinarily compelling characterization of Satan.
理所当然,弥尔顿会想要在始终写明这个问题,关于撒旦过分引人注目的性格的问题。
Nobody knows, but there's a theory which won't answer your question but will put it into a broader context.
没有人知道答案,但有这么个理论,它无法回答你的问题,但却能让你从更宽广的视角来看这个问题
Now in thinking about this question thinking about this question it's important not to misunderstand what we were asking.
思考这个问题的时候,在思考这个问题,重要的是不要误解,我们问的问题。
There are widespread controversies about it, and many of the courses you would take in law school are meant to try to get to the bottom of these thorny questions.
这个问题有很多争议,法学院的很多课都旨在,把这些棘手的问题弄得水落石出。
And I'm going to show you an example in a 1 second, just to drive this home, but notice the characteristics. In the first two cases, the problem reduced by 1 at each step.
在前面两个例子里,每一部问题的规模缩小了,不管是迭代的还是递归的,这表明这个问题的复杂性可能是线性的。
Here, the problem is solved by injecting it directly into the cell, shown here, and then that's one issue with gene delivery.
现在,这个问题已经通过,将其直接注入细胞的方法解决了,图上这里,这只解决了基因输送的一个问题
I have sorted with the smaller problem 1 because that smaller problem right now is of size 1 and so it's sort of obviously the case that this cup is now sorted.
对这个较小的问题我已经排好序了,因为在这个小问题中只有1个元素1,那么很明显,这个杯子已经是有序的了。
The debate over that question is fierce, and it's one we're going to leave for another day.
对于这一问题的讨论相当激烈,我们将留下这个问题以后讨论。
All right. So let's do an in-class problem, and this will be done with zinc.
好的,让我们做一个课堂上的问题,这个问题需要用锌来完成。
Portion sizes, and we'll devote a class to this later on, have gone way up and that's a big problem, the amount of processing I mentioned.
食物份量直线上升,这是个问题,我们将专门用一堂课讲这个,即刚才提到的食品加工程度的问题
Because I thought about it a lot Welles chose that word I guess obviously that frame was a happy picture ? In the word? Why that word?
因为我对这个问题想了很多,为什么威尔斯要选择这个词,我觉得很明显,这个镜头是幸福的,词内涵的深意?还是为什么选这个词?
It's not as equitably distributed as one would like it to be distributed.
因为分配不均的问题,这个问题从来就没有顺过民意。
To begin to answer this question you might say even begin to think about it in the right way requires that we stand back from Aristotle's text for a while and ask some fundamental questions about it.
若要开始回答这个问题,你也甚至可以说,开始以正确的方式思考这个问题,需要我们,暂时放下亚里士多德的大作,回头提问一些基本的问题。
So, it could be very interesting for all of us to have issues to discuss in class, and quite often some questions are very common and your classmates will be grateful to you that you brought it up.
所以,大家一起在课堂上讨论一些问题,这会非常有意思,还有些时候,你们的问题很普遍,而你的同学会很感激你提出了这个问题
The questions that I'm asking on this quiz-- the questions asked on the quiz-- are the types of things we would expect you to know at the end of the course-- not now, but at the end of the course.
这个小测验中我提出来的一系列的的问题,小测验中的问题都是我们希望你,在课程结束时,能够掌握到的知识点,并非现在,而是在课程结束后
And the question is how does poverty fit into that question of life issues, with the prolife, with the death penalty.
问题是,贫困问题,是怎样和反堕胎,死刑等问题一同,被纳入生命这个话题中来的。
You're going to see the arguments about space if you take some of the courses that follow on, and again, some nice courses about that. For this course, we're not going to worry about space that much. What we're really going to focus on is time.
在以后的其他课程上你们,会学到一些关于空间的参数,一些讲这个的,很不错的课程,但是在这门课上,我们并不太关心空间问题,我们真正关心的是时间问题。
Our course over the term will come back to this question over and over again, and it will also come back to the generic question of autobiography.
我们这学期的课程,会反复回顾这个问题,也会再回到关于自传的一般性问题。
It's a good question. The question is, "What are the chances that somebody with autism will be able to overcome their deficiencies?"
不错的问题,这个问题是,"孤独症患者,能够克服自身缺陷的几率会有多大"
But what is the commonality about getting to that question, because I think, maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong here, campus life in some ways is about that question.
但说到刚才的问题,不同学校对此共性是什么,因为,要是我说错了您可以纠正我,校园生活在某些方面是和这个问题有关的。
The question is from that special eager realistic perspective we were all familiar with, ? which is the one you really care about?
这个问题针对的是,我们都很熟悉的现实角度的问题,你们真正关心的是哪个人?
Another side effect if you take too much lithium is death, so that's no good to have in sodas either, and it might not have been as big a deal back in the 1920's, but you can imagine with supersizing today, this might be a bigger problem.
另一个副作用是因为摄入锂过量而死,这更说明在汽水里放这种东西是不好的,这在二十世纪二十年代可能没什么大问题,但你可以想象在如今这个什么都超标的时代,这也许会出更大的问题。
Well, this is the question raised by the skeptic about skepticism or about theory and it's one that we're going to take rather seriously, but we're going to come back to it because there are ways, it seems to me, of keeping this question at arm's length.
这是由对怀疑论或理论持怀疑态度的人提出来的问题,也是我们要认真探讨的,但是我们还会回来继续讨论,因为对我而言,我们需要和这个问题保持一定距离。
But then also a little bit about your history, where you come from, some of your experiences which have helped you or informed your opinions on this very difficult issue that the entire world really is spending a lot of time trying to work on.
然后再谈谈你们各自的经历,你们从何而来,谈一些你们自己的经历,一些帮助过你们,或形成了你们,就这个复杂问题的观点,这个全世界都在投入大量时间试图解决的问题。
Well, realize one of the themes in this course and really one of the themes in programming and solving any problem with a machine is going to be really to just take small bites one at a time out of these problems until the end result ultimately is that you've actually bitten off a fairly large fairly interesting problem and in the aggregate, you've actually implemented something pretty sophisticated.
好吧,让我们先想一下这件事带给我们的主题,编程和解决问题的思想,一台机器最开始只会一步一个脚印,沿着要解决的问题向前迈进,直到最终的结果出来,最后你会发现,你已经解决了一个相当大,相当有趣的问题,而这个问题在最初看起来确是相当复杂的。
Now. You might look at that and say, well that's just a lot like what we had over here Right? We had some additive constant plus a simpler version of the same problem reduced in size by 1.
现在你可能会看着这个说,这很像我们以前做过的,对不对?我们用一些附加的常量,加上问题的另外一个规模缩小了1的,简化版本来代替这个问题本身。
Not so easy to see. All right, but this is actually a great one of those educational moments. This is a great example to think recursively. If I wanted to think about this problem recursively- what do I mean by thinking recursively?
看不太出来,好,但实际上是一个有教育意义的时刻,这是一个很好的关于递归的例子,如果我用递归的思想,去考虑这个问题-,我该怎么用递归去解决这个问题呢?
应用推荐