-
But then, it seems that property, what counts as property is not natural but conventional defined by the government.
但然后，他的意思似乎是如何界定财产权,不是与生俱来而是约定俗成的，是由政府定义的。
-
He is clear about that. But then he goes on to say, and that's the natural right to property.
他非常明确这点，但之后他又说，而且财产权是自然权利。
-
Nature gave each individual the right to life, liberty, property, and nobody could take these away legitimately.
自然赋予每个个体以,生命权,自由权和财产权,没有人有权力剥夺
-
That was the whole reason for entering society in the first place, to protect the right to property.
这就是当初人们加入社会的初衷，为了保护财产权。
-
The property rights are established and enforced by the government, which is a democratic government, and we have representatives to enforce those rights.
财产权是由政府确立并且强制实施的，而且是由民主政府，代表我们，来强制实施这些权利。
-
But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利，尊重我们不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权。
-
But at some point you have to understand that the benefits of redistribution of wealth don't justify the initial violation of the property right.
但某种程度上说，你得明白,财富重新分配的好处,并不能为侵犯财产权正名。
-
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权，多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利，不能侵犯你基本的生命，自由和财产权。
-
There is punishment and before you know it, everybody is insecure in the enjoyment of his or her unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
就能惩罚他，不知不觉间，所有人不可剥夺的生命，自由,和财产权都没了保障。
-
The right to property is a natural right in the sense that it is prepolitical.
财产权某种意义上可以说是,先于政治的自然权利。
-
Going back to the first point that you made about the property rights of individual.
回到你最初提到,关于个人财产权的观点。
-
John Locke said private property arises because when we mix our labor with things, unowned things, we come to aquire a property right in those things.
约翰·洛克说，私有财产权之所以兴起,是因为我们将劳动付诸于无主的事物，所以取得了这些东西的产权。
-
.. Yes. By Locke's definition, you can say... So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed a property right in the land itself.
是的，按照洛克的定义，你可以说。,也许按照洛克的定义，印第安人可以宣称拥有对该土地的财产权。
-
Why is the fundamental right to religious liberty different from the right Alex asserts as a fundamental right to private property and to keep what I earn?
为什么宗教信仰权这一基本权利,不同于亚历克斯主张的,私有财产权，和保有自己财产的基本权利？
-
It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.
自然权利是说财产权是基本的不可剥夺的,正因为它是这样的权利，所以有产权制度存在，并被政府所尊重。
-
And when Locke speaks about the right to property, he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category, the right to life, liberty, and property.
洛克所说的所有权，通常概括了所有的自然权利，即生命，自由和财产权。
-
John? - It violates property rights. It's wrong.
约翰呢，-他侵犯了财产权，所以是不对的。
-
If the majority rules that there should be taxation, even if the minority should still not have to be taxed because that's taking away property, which is one of the rights of nature.
即使多数人规定应当征税，少数人仍并不一定非要交税,因为那等于夺走少数人的财产，而财产权是自然权利之一。
-
So property rights is not the issue.
财产权不是问题。
-
But what about the part of 138, if you keep reading, "Men, therefore, in society having property, they have such a right to the goods, " which by the law of the community are theirs."
但继续读下去，138节后面部分又如何呢，“因此，在社会中享有财产权的人们，对于那些根据社会的法律，是属于他们的财产，就享有这样一种权利“
-
On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.
一方面，我们有不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权，这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃，正是这些权利，造成了对合法政府的限制。
-
This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.
任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。
-
We agree on property rights.
我们都认同财产权。
-
The fact that I have one, you know, five hundred thousandth of the vote for one representative in congress is not the same thing as my having the ability to decide for myself how to use my property rights.
事实是，我只有一张选票，50万选民才票选出,一位国会议员,这与我能自己决定如何行使我的财产权,是两回事。
-
"The supreme power," By which Locke means the legislature, "Cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent, for the preservation of property being the end of government and that for which men enter into society, " it necessarily supposes and requires that people should have property."
最高权力“,这里洛克指的是立法机关，“未经本人同意，不能取去任何人财产的任何部分，因为，既然保护财产是政府的目的,也是人们加入社会的目的，这就必然假定而且要求人民应该享有财产权“
-
We've extrapolated that people have property rights and so whether or not it would be a good thing or a nice thing or even a necessary thing for the survival of some people, we don't see that that justifies the violation of the right that we've logically extrapolated.
我们已经推出人们有财产权,所以，就算是为了做好事，做善事,甚至是为了让某些人活下去而必须做的事，那也是不能证明，侵犯这些推定的权利,就是正当的。
应用推荐