This is what Tynjanov says: In formalist historiography, the prime significance of major social factors is not at all discarded.

提尼亚诺夫这样说：,在形式主义者编写历史时，并没有完全忽略主要社会力量的重要性。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

It's important in Darwinian terms to have it in the back of our minds, and that's what Tynjanov is insisting on.

它是达尔文主义的重要特征，也是提尼亚诺夫坚持的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

At the moment we have been assigned four TAs, though looking around we won't need four TAs, but at the moment we have Da-Ihn Yoo, we have Michael Verriman, we have Andrey Ivanov, and we have Brian Reilly.

目前给我们安排了四个助教,虽然我觉得用不了四个,不过我们目前还是有余大有,和迈克尔·韦里曼和安德烈·伊凡诺夫,还有布莱恩·莱利

耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

If you are reminded here by the passage of Tynjanov that I gave you where he makes the distinction between literary history as evolving and literary history as modified by outside circumstances, I think it would be a legitimate parallel.

如果你们可以会想起我以前让你们读的提尼亚诺夫,那篇区分作为演变和,由外界因素改造的文学史的文章，那么一切就合乎逻辑了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选