Anybody have any questions on that, because when we voted, the majority of the class thought it was reversible Yes.

上节课我们投票时，多数人都认为它是一个可逆过程，而现在大家应该都知道了,它其实是不可逆过程，有问题吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

This is called ionization, gas phase species loses an electron.

而这个过程是离子化，气相组分失去一个电子。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Their distinctive customs manners laws habits moral dispositions and sentiments and Aristotle's constitutional theorizing begins by asking a simple question.

意即他们特有的习惯，风俗，法律，习性,道德意向及社群观感,而亚里士多德的本质理论化过程,是透过提问一个简单的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

There's no change in them, and then we also looked at some at non-state functions, work and heat, and saw that those aren't zero going around a cycle. Of course you can do work in a cyclic process, and heat can be exchanged with the environment at the same time.

它们不会有变化，然后我们研究了,一些非态函数，功和热量，并看到,沿着循环行进一周的话,它们并不是零，当然你可以在,一个循环过程中做功，而同时热量可以在系统,与外界环境之间进行交换。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

By the next slice down we'll be able to eliminate what is it about 20 and above, so 30 down to above 20, and this will be an 'in shoes, in shoes, in shoes'.

再往下我们可以继续剔除,是多少来着,20以上的数,在20到30之间的,而这会是一个三次换位思考的过程

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So the first argument, that's a straight forward argument, the second argument says, I put myself in other peoples shoes, I realize they're not going to play a dominated strategy, and therefore, having realized they're not going to play a dominated strategy, I shouldn't play a strategy between 45 and 67.

所以第一个过程是直截了当地,而第二个过程,我从别人的角度思考,发现他们并不会选择劣势策略,意识到他们并不会选择劣势策略后,我也不应该选择45至67的数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选