And archaeologists for a long time were convinced that they would find these destruction layers. But they were disappointed.
考古学家在很长一段时间都相信,他们能找到那些被摧毁的层面,但他们失望了。
So there are two other models, then, models different from the immigration model, two other models for understanding the formation of Israel, that build on this archaeological evidence.
那么还有两个其他的模型,与移民模型不同的两个模型,这两个模型也是为了说明以色列的形成,它们是依据考古学证据。
Someone has just gotten a PHD in anthropology, or I guess archaeology probably.
他刚刚获得了人类学的博士学位,或者有可能是考古学。
There's no question that there was a Greek colony there and as I say the archaeological remains confirm the general time for this happening.
这是确凿无误的,但是,正如我所说,考古学上仍有某些有待解决的问题
The source doesn't tell us that, and in fact there's really no archeological evidence of a group, a large group, entering the land of Canaan at this time.
资料来源并没有告诉我们,事实上,并没有考古学证据表明,有一个部族,大部族在那个时候进入迦南。
So it's that combination, archaeology plus Greek tradition that lies behind the date of any city.
这是个综合了考古学和不同城邦时期下,古希腊人的传统记载得出的
That civilization was uncovered by the archaeologists right at the beginning of the twentieth century.
考古学家在二十世纪初首次发现了,拥有该特征的文明
Well, archaeologists investigated this carefully, and the French School of Archaeology late in the nineteenth century dug everything up and concluded this was baloney; it was a myth.
十九世纪末期,法国建筑学院的,考古学家仔细调查了这个神庙,他们研究出了很多东西,包括以上说的故事,他们认为完全是个神话
Archaeologists in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were stunned to find the ruins and the records of remarkable peoples and cultures--massive, complex empires in some cases, but some of which had completely disappeared from human memory.
十九和二十世纪的考古学家们,震惊地发现了,古代伟大名族和文化的遗迹,有些还是大规模,复杂的帝国遗迹,但也有一些就完全从人类记忆中消失了。
I mentioned last time William F. Albright, an American archaeologist.
我上次提到威廉·亚布莱特,一个美国考古学家。
Also archaeological evidence contradicts the picture in Joshua.
而考古学证据也与《约书亚书》的描述矛盾。
And archaeology supports this picture of merging of peoples, a picture of the merging of peoples, rather than conquest or even large-scale immigration, because the new settlements in this period show such continuity with the past, not a complete break, not the initiation of something radically new.
考古学肯定了民族的融合,多个民族相融合的图景,而不是征服或者是大规模的移民,因为这一时期新的定居表明,与过去的连续继承,而不是完全的断裂,不是完全的新的开始。
Now, what we learn, both from archaeology and from references in the Linear B tablets is that they engaged-- these cultures engaged in trade to a significant degree.
现在,我们从考古学,以及B类线形文字刻板中的线索得知,这些文明中具有相当多的贸易因素
应用推荐