Again, all the people at 1, all the people at 2, and half the people at 3, so that's 25%.

就是立场1和立场2的全部票数,加上立场3票数一半,一共是25%

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Well assume that we're in a plurality election here, so the winner is the person who gets a plurality.

假设我们在进行一个多数制选举,所以当选者是获得票数最多的人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The reason this isn't a terrible assumption is you could think that getting a higher share of the vote gives you a mandate.

这么假设没什么不妥,因为你可以认为获得更多的票数,意味着你会获得委任机会

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We'll assume that if there's a tie that we flip a fair coin or a Supreme Court judge, whatever you want to take, whichever.

我们将假设如果有人票数一致,我们就掷硬币或由最高法院裁决,不论你们想用那种方法

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Or, if this is a primary election, a larger share of the vote gives you a bigger push for the next primary or whatever.

或者把它看成是总统大选的初选,获得更多的票数,对你下一轮的选举起到积极作用

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Let's count. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 he's going to get 10 votes, including himself there are 10 votes here.

我们数一下1233456789,他将获得10票,包括他自己的票数在内有10票

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

In particular, if the other candidate were to choose position 1, I would get a higher share of the vote choosing 2 than I would have done if I had chosen 3.

如果对手选择立场1,我选立场2会比选立场3,得到更多的票数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选