It's a process of undoing and undermining that really eats away at the argument, we could argue, throughout the entirety of Areopagitica.
这是个论点开始慢慢被侵蚀破坏的过程,我们可以争论这点,贯穿整个《论出版自由》中。
In other words, doesn't historicism open the canon and indeed make the process of reading, the experience of reading, archival and omnivorous rather than canonical?
换言之,难道不是历史相对论破坏了标准,甚至让阅读的过程,阅读的经历,变得如档案般无所不包,而不是遵守规范?
应用推荐