They will convert it they'll take portions of John Locke that they like, and not the others and they'll say the real rule of the world is not natural equality, but it is natural inequality.
他们会转变它,他们接受约翰·洛克理论的一部分观点,排斥他们不喜欢的,而且他们说真正的世界法则,不是天生平等,而是天生不平等的
More generally speaking, we might say, they're subject to deterministic laws... that, as physical objects, it's true of them that they must do what the laws of physics and laws of nature require that they do.
我们甚至可以这样说,它们受制于决定性的法则,即,作为物理实体,它们必须按照,物理定律和自然法则的要求去做
What are we to make of these laws, ? as I've asked before? In one sense, there seems to be a genuine moral content to Hobbes' laws of nature which can : be reduced to a single formula: Seek peace above all other goods.
就像我曾经说过的那样,我们会怎样制定这些法则呢,从某种角度看,在霍布斯的自然法中,似乎有一个真正的道德内涵,可以简化成一个公式:,在一切物质层面之上寻求和平。
And then you had you had your basic republican interpretation that said they were defending the Republic against this sort of monarchy to be restored, and that certainly is part of that as well; but, it also had its socialist component and Marx, for Marx this was terribly important and for Lenin it was as well.
共和党人的说法则是,他们在保卫共和政体,防止王朝复辟,这是也是另一种传说而已,但它也有其社会主义属性,还有马克思,这对于马克思,列宁而言相当有意义
That's how he often writes about human behavior, that we obey the same laws of physical attraction as do any other bodies that we might choose to describe. They describe how bodies in motion always and necessarily behave, these laws of nature.
这是他经常说的人类行为,我们遵守同样的物质吸引的法则,其他人也一样,他们描述运动中的身体,经常而且肯定会,体现出自然法。
应用推荐