• We're going to go to the realm of Western jazz here and I'm going to pick on Chuck Mangione.

    我们来看看西方的爵士乐领域,我选了查克·曼卓林

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • We basically had 7 classes every year, so I took quite a variety.

    我们每年最少会有7门课,所以我选了这么多。

    关于早期入学申请 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • And they formed seven undergraduates and we went around to peer institutions of Princeton, and wrote a report.

    他们选了七名本科生,然后我们去参观了一些,普林斯顿大学相似的机构,写了一篇报告。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • So there's lots of things when we look at this model there's lots of things that are missing.

    已经有很多因素了,当我们再仔细分析这个模型时,我们之前的分析漏掉了很多因素

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Ironically, unification proclaimed in the Hall of Mirrors at the Chateau of Versailles, which we'll visit for a few seconds later on.

    讽刺的是,宣布统一的地点在了凡尔赛宫镜厅,这个地方马上我们会看到的

    耶鲁公开课 - 欧洲文明课程节选

  • We'll try to make sure everybody's schedule is accommodated, and you'll either meet on Thursdays or Fridays, in discussion sections,and we'll organize those sections closer to the end of the shopping period, when we have a better idea who will be in here.

    我们会尽量大家都有空的时段,不是周四就是周五,这些讨论环节,会在课周临近结束前决定,这样我们可以知道谁选了这门课。

    耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

  • One year we actually had something like forty-two people signed up, and the course was much bigger, and we thought they all thought they were getting a free prize or something for signing up, there were so many of them.

    有一年还真有,大概四十二个学生选了这课,那课堂大多了,当时我们觉得那些学生,是不是觉得课能有奖励还是什么的,总之人特别多

    耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

  • Look first at the sheet that gives you the titles of God, and you'll see that in the patriarchal traditions so we're talking about Genesis primarily; I've thrown in some other texts also, but focusing for a moment on the patriarchal traditions of Genesis El SHaddai God is six times called El Shaddai.

    首先看看列出了上帝名称的那一页,你们会看到,在宗法封建传统中,我们现在主要讨论《创世纪》,我也选了其他的章节,但先着重《创世纪》中的宗法封建传统,上帝有六次被称为。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • Okay.I think we have something.I've chosen something called Badly Drawn Boy.

    好,我们举几个例子。我选了Badly,Drawn,Boy的作品。

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • -- Else if n is greater than 4 and n is less than 6 -- 7 let's call it medium -- else if n is greater than or equal to 7, -- less than or equal to 10 -- let's call it "big" -- and if the user typed in zero or negative 10 or 20 or whatever, let's just use the all-inclusive else block and just say, "You picked an invalid number."

    否则如果n大于4,并且n小于-,我们叫它为中间数--否则如果n大于等于,小于等于10--我们叫它为“大数“,如果用户键入了0或者-10或20或其它的,让我们用一个广泛的else子句,只需要说,“你选了一个非法的数字“

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • And we've already agreed that if I think it's equally likely they're going to choose right and left, that there's a probability ?

    而且我们已经计算过了,如果我觉得对手,右的概率相同,即他们右的概率为1/2时

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In the first game, it was kind of clear that we should choose Alpha and here it's not at all clear what we can do-- what we should do.

    在第一个博弈里,我们很显然应该α,但这次我们应该怎么就很不确定了

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We played a game at the very end last time, where each of you chose a number - all of you chose a number - and we said the winner was going to be the person who gets closest to two-thirds of the average in the class.

    我们在上节课最后做了一个游戏,你们每个人都选了一个数字,你们所有的人都择了一个数字,择的数字最接近全班,平均数的三分之二的人就是赢家

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

    克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人择这些立场时,我们会发现,立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So the easy ones are on the diagonal: you both get B- if we both choose Alpha; we both get B+ if we both choose Beta.

    这样就更直观了,如果我们α的话得B-,如果我们β的话得B+

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Then we picked out a series of special topics.

    然后我们选了一些话题。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • Everyone agree because 5 is bigger than 1, and 5 is bigger than 4, so Up is and to use a technical term we'll define formally next time Up is the best response to Left.

    大家都知道5大于1,5也大于4,所以上是,以后我们就要用术语来说了,上是左的最佳对策

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So certainly part of the problem here, with the reasoning I just gave you-- the reasoning that said I should choose Beta, because if we both reason the same way, we both do better that way-- involves some kind of magical reasoning.

    那么说问题就出在了这里,就是之前我们说应该β的问题,如果我们要都这么想,确实得到更好成绩,但这是有前提的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定