• Suppose we think, "Look, you can't have free will and determinism.

    我们想想看,人不能既有自由意志又遵从决定

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So even if determinism were true of us, that wouldn't rule out our having free will, because you can-- appearances to the contrary notwithstanding-- have both determinism and free will.

    所以即使我们真的服从于决定论,那也不能排除我们有自由意志的可能,因为你能,尽管表面看来并非如此,同时遵从决定论和拥有自由意志

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And going back to your observation you were supporting what the Federal Reserve was doing t count on every individual decision.

    那么回到刚才你说到的,支持美联储大幅,我们不能指望任何个人做出的决定,I,wouldn’

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • If determinism isn't true of us at the fundamental level, then even if you couldn't both have determinism and free will, we could still have free will, and yet, for all that, still be purely physical systems.

    如果决定论在基础水平上不适用于我们,那即使你不能,同时遵从决定论和拥有自由意志,我们仍能拥有自由意志,而且,尽管如此,我们仍旧属于纯粹的物理系统

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So even if it does turn out that you can't have free will and determinism, that doesn't rule out the possibility that we are purely physical objects, because not all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

    因此即使最终证实,你不能同时拥有自由意志和遵从决定论,也不能排除我们是纯粹,物理实体的可能性,因为并不是所有的纯粹物理系统,都遵从决定

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定