And so the balance of the attractive term and the repulsive term eventually leads us to this situation where we have the equilibrium spacing.
在吸引力,和排斥的共同作用下,得到这种结果,即空间上的平衡。
What does come out, which is very useful is, if you do run the reaction, here's how much heat comes out.
能得到的结果是,如果我们进行这个化学反应,有多少热量放出,当然这也是很重要的。
And then the person who actually plugs in all the numbers and gets the right number will get ten.
对于那些人,他们加了所有的数,并且得到正确的结果,将会得到十分。
Because I thought the payoffs - the two different payoffs that I could have gotten-- were highest if I chose Alpha.
因为我发现,如果我选α的话,我得到的两种结果是最优的
google Imagine you want to search through Google to find a particular page. You want to do it in a second. And you're going to just do it the brute force way, assuming you could even reach all of those pages in that time.
假设你想通过,搜索一个特定的网页,你想在1秒内得到结果,然后你就只管去做了,认为能在1秒内遍历遍所有的网页。
Three. Good, so everyone that recognized that probably got the right answer of three angular nodes here.
三,很好,那么知道这一点的同学,应该都得到了正确结果,也就是三个角向节点。
So things break if you try-- if the computer tries to take you too literally so it would not be correct generally to do something like that.
如果你把它分开-,那么电脑会逐字逐句地解析,你拆开写的代码,由此得到的结果一般都是错误的。
And that's essentially what we saw people have more nucleus accumbens activation priority choice " they are more likely to choose that stock.
这就是我们得到的结果,在作出选择时,受试者的伏隔核活动越多,他们就越有可能选择“股票。
The same results also showed up about a year and a half ago.
一年半前也得到同样的结果。
And then the investigators actually measured these things, and found that with reported and actual energy intake, how many calories people were consuming, there was really quite a difference.
研究人员实际上得到了以下结果,实验对象汇报的和实际的能量摄入,也就是人们摄入的卡路里,两者有较大差异
you are going to get the same answer.
你都会得到相同的结果
He says, "to succeed in many things or many times is 'difficult.' For instance, to repeat the same throw of dice 10,000 times would be impossible; whereas, to make it once or twice is comparatively easy."
他说,要成就很多事情,或成就一件事情很多次,是很困难的,比如,掷一万次骰子都得到同样的结果,是不可能的,但是,掷一两次却是相对容易的
She said, no matter what the other person does, she reckons she'd get a better grade if she chose Alpha.
她说无论别人怎么选,她觉得选α会使自己得到最优的结果
What comes out of the math is that the value of k, there are multiple values, there are multiple solutions.
得到的数学结果是k的值,这有多种值,多种解法。
So again, for both heat and work we don't get the same result. Now let's look at our special function, right. So here's path A.
所以,再一次说明,对于热量和功,我们得到的结果是不同的,现在让我们看看我们的特殊函数。
And he gets, you are absolutely right, 00163 it is not 4.0, it is 4.00163. Take that.
他得到的结果是,你完全是对的,不是4。0,是4。
So if we look at what we've got here, we've got something rather peculiar, right? What's peculiar about what this computer is now printing for us?
那么如果我们看看,现在我们得到的,结果的话,结果相当奇怪,对不对?计算机现在显示的结果?
So you can see that we're starting to have a very complicated equation, and it turns out that it's mathematically impossible to even solve the exact Schrodinger equation as we move up to higher numbers of electrons.
所有你们可以看到我们得到了,一个非常复杂的方程,结果是它在数学上是,不可能解出确定的,薛定谔方程,当我们考虑更高的电子数目的时候。
That's something you find out by experiment.
这个结果是实验得到的
And blind here is a technical term meaning she had no idea what the baby saw, and the point about this is to avoid either intentional or unintentional sort of trying to get the answer you want.
这里的盲性是个术语,意味着主试完全不知道婴儿看到了什么,这样做的目的在于,避免主试因想要得到自己所想要的结果,而进行的有意或无意的尝试
So when you put together the race risk that was highest if-- you may remember in the Mexican-Americans, and with the gender risk, higher rates in women, you'd expect the rates to be especially high in Mexican-American women, and in fact, that's what you find.
将有最高患病风险的种族,记得是墨西哥裔美国人,结合患病风险较高的女性,我们会预想墨西哥裔女性,患病的风险会特别高,而事实上这也是研究得到的结果
But I want to go back there because what I want to do now is, I want to change some critical assumptions of that model and see that by making those changes, we're going to get some very different outcomes.
但我回来的原因是,我想改变一些模型的关键假设,并看看通过这些改变,我们将得到何种不同的结果
Well, we play with it, the way I've been playing with it and compare the results to some set of real data.
好啦,我们来试一下我们之前也做过,就是用我们得到的结果和实际结果相对比。
epsilon I gave it here a different epsilon, and you'll note, we get different answers.
我换个不同的,你可以看到我们得到的结果还是不同的。
There it is. He used the prism spectrograph to analyze his results. So what do we have here?
在这里,他用了棱镜分光图来分析他的结果,得到些什么呢?
So, let's look at where this comes from with an energy level diagram here.
让我们从这个能级图,来看看怎么得到这个结果的。
And of course I get out the value I'd like there.
当然我会从这里得到我想要的结果值。
So in some sets, as long as x has the value I want, it ought to do the right thing.
所以在某些结构中只要x的,只是我想要的我就能得到正确的结果。
That person will get a different answer.
他会得到一个不同的结果
So that means that we don't have to worry about things like wave functions when we're talking about Lewis structures, but because they're so simple to use and because they so often predict the electron configuration of molecules accurately, we end up using them all the time in chemistry, so it's very valuable to know how to draw them correctly and to know how to work with them.
因此这也就意味着我们在讨论路易斯结构的时候,不需要担心波函数之类的东西,但是由于路易斯结构不仅简单易用,而且用它来预测分子的电子排布,经常可以得到非常精确的结果,结果我们在化学中一直都在用它,因此知道如何正确地画出并运用,路易斯结构是非常有价值的。
应用推荐