Now this--as you think about it, you say to yourself, That's all very bracing and daring but Veselovsky is right.
现在你也许会暗自认为,嗯,这观点很新鲜大胆,但是什克洛夫斯基是对的。
Right, so there's that special sentinel value that's back slash zero, which we'll start to see more explicitly now.
对的,这里有一个特殊的值“反斜杠0“,我们等下会更了解它。
Now you're right: you're right if you have the feeling that you've heard a lot of these same ideas before.
你们是对的:如果你们觉得,这些说法都是老生常谈了。
So hopefully you're convinced that your predictions worked well and you are able to predict what's going on when you're looking at the photoelectric effect.
希望你们确信,你们的预测都是对的,而且当你们考虑光电效应的问题时,你们可以预测。
Try it again. So, sure enough, changing the bias changed the price, and even changed it in the right direction.
我们再来运行一下,好了,很明显,这个偏向值改变了价格,而且方向也是对的。
The recognition of those qualities, the recognition of the arete that these heroes have is what their lives are all about.
这些英雄所拥有的对这些品质的认知,对德性的认知,就是对他们人生意义的认知
It was impossible-- doctors and scientists showed, runners, athletes, the top-ones in the world proved that the doctors were right.
那是不可能的,医生和科学家证明了,跑手,运动员,世上顶尖选手证明了医生们是对的。
So Thomas said something which was true, but it doesn't quite match with the definition of a dominated strategy.
托马斯所说的是对的,但这的确劣势策略的定义不太相符
And ironically you sense, when you read this that even though Cain intends this as a rhetorical question "Am I my brother's keeper?"--in fact, he's right on the money.
当读到这一段的时候,你能感觉到其中的讽刺意味,尽管该隐的回答是一个设问句,“难道我是他的看守吗?“,事实上,指钱的话,他说的是对的。
It still seems wrong in a way that it doesn't seem wrong in the first case to turn, you say.
反正就是不对,而在第一种情况,这样做就是对的,是吧。
And he gets, you are absolutely right, 00163 it is not 4.0, it is 4.00163. Take that.
他得到的结果是,你完全是对的,不是4。0,是4。
Because certainly there is a theory that art's main function is to provide succor and solace in this "vail of tears". -Right.
因为确实有一种理论认为艺术的主要,功能是提供帮助与安慰,因为世界纷繁而痛苦,-对的。
And if that's true, then of course, we no longer have an argument for the indestructibility or nearly indestructibility of the soul.
而如果那是对的,当然我们就,不能再论证灵魂的不可摧毁性,或者几乎不可摧毁性。
That's not what I was looking for but that's part of the answer, so you're absolutely right. Yes?
我想说的不是这个,但这也是原因之一,你说的肯定是对的,请说
If I only worry about minimizing the energy, it's true They'll stick together a little bit.
如果我只关心能量最低,这是对的,分子会黏在一起。
Absolutely. Confined settings, very confined settings, absolutely. Yes. What else? Yes.
对的,既定的设置,非常限定的设置,对的,还有什么。
Not quite right. When people are-- have an internal conflict, when there's something uncomfortable-- Well, that's right.
这说得不是很正确,当人们…,心理活动产生矛盾时,当他们碰到不安的情况时-,这是对的。
And he was right; they got immunity and were protected from smallpox when it affected their community.
他是对的,当天花在周围流行时,他们具备了对天花的免疫力
But this happens to be completely legitimate, so I'm going to assume it's true and I'll maybe take a second explaination why it's legitimate.
但这里所说的情况是完全合理的,所以我先假设这是对的,待会儿再进一步解释为什么合理
They can't both be right. -And both of them are following the rules to the tee.
他们不可能都是对的,-而他们,都是遵循规则行事的。
And that would often actually the right answer to take, is to not just compromise among your advisers, but use your own principles to make a decision.
而且通常情况,他的观点是对的,并不是向智囊团的意见妥协,而是根据自己的原则做决定。
And remember again, the binding energy physically is the negative of the ionization energy, and that's actually how you can experimentally check to see if this is actually correct.
电离能的负值,那个事实上是可以,通过实验来验证,它是否是对的,并且它等于负的。
But, just to be sure, not to be sure, but just to increase my confidence, I'm going to just run it again.
所以说它是对的是很有道理的,但是,确定一下,但是为了提高我们的自信,我要再运行一次。
If you think of these kind of like trays in a cafeteria, right, that are kind of upside down, and by default, they're stacked from the floor on up and up and up.
如果你想象这种自助餐厅的托盘,对的,那有点混乱的,默认的,它们从地板开始往上堆起来。
Right. So similarly, if you've got one line of code with a semicolon at the end saying, this is the end of the statement, it doesn't really make sense to continue that conversation to try to continue conceptually that puzzle piece with curly braces.
对的,类似的,如果你得到了一行代码,后面有一个分号,标志语句的结尾,这就没有意义来继续,那个会话来尝试对那段代码,使用花括号。
I think it's, but it's more complicated, but you're basically right, basically right.
它比不可逆膨胀更复杂,但是你的观点从原则上来说是对的。
I mean the problem is, say, Freud says to a patient, " Freud says, "I'm right."
问题是,比如,弗洛伊德对病人说,弗洛伊德就会说,“我是对的“
If the physicalist is right, then here's another physical object for you... me, Shelly Kagan.
假如物理主义是对的,那么给你们再举一个物理对象的例子,我,雪莱·卡根
It's the fact that there's an element of truth in it that makes it seem like a good argument.
它确实有点道理,不然那个说法也不会听起来像是对的
When you're teaching it you get to call it your Sorry John, you're absolutely right. OK.
你是对的,顺便请你们注意一下。
应用推荐