Because they would have started with the hypothesis, not that there existed a month, but that June was particularly likely.
因为他们是有了假设然后再开始做实验的,而不是说有一个这样特殊的月份,而是六月是一个特殊的月份。
This is the place where people typically slip up in debugging. They don't think in advance what they expect the result to be.
实验就推翻了你的假设了,人们在做调试的时候往往忽略了这一点,他们做实验之前并没有想想。
Suppose the Milgram experiment had never been done and it was being done for the first time here.
假设米尔格林姆实验从来没有执行过,今天才第一次做这个实验。
So, if I've got positive charge uniformly distributed, look at the choice. It's a brilliant experiment.
所以如果按照正电荷是均匀分布的假设来说,就会是这样的,这是一个聪明的实验。
Somebody? What's the key thing? It must have the potential to refute the hypothesis.
有人知道么?关键点在哪儿?,实验必须有反驳我们假设的可能。
应用推荐