No, they didn't. Not initially at any rate, but notice as we played the game repeatedly, what happens?
我觉得绝对没有人会,但是注意下如果我们重复博弈会怎样呢
Right, so the fact that everything is indented means while 2 we're doing, while the variable is not equal to 2, keep doing this.
事实上缩进意味着,如果变量不等于,就重复我们现在所做的这个过程。
So in formalist terms, that's the way we have to understand what, if we weren't formalists, we would suppose, as I say, to be a mnemotechnical device for the purpose of communicating something about the weather in Spain. Right?
形式主义者会这样理解,但如果我们不是形式主义者,我们就会认为这个重复单纯是为了,记住西班牙的天气,对吗?
So, if it's a duplication of sound, let's duplicate the letters.
那么,如果这是种声音的复制,我们就可以重复这些字母
We have to understand the way in which what we do and say, what we write in our papers and articles, is grounded in theoretical premises which, if we don't come to terms with them, we will simply naively reproduce without being fully aware of how we're using them and how, indeed, they are using us.
我们所为,所说,和在论文中所写的内容,是以一些理论,为前提的,如果不接受这些理论,那我们就不过是天真地重复,根本不知道,我们是如何利用它们的。
应用推荐